Travelers Ins. Co. v. Mimbs, 44815
| Citation | 120 Ga.App. 599,171 S.E.2d 659 |
| Decision Date | 05 November 1969 |
| Docket Number | No. 44815,No. 3,44815,3 |
| Parties | TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY et al., v. Mrs. Allison D. MIMBS |
| Court | United States Court of Appeals (Georgia) |
Greene, Buckley, DeRieux, Moore & Jones, Thomas B. Branch, III, Hugh Robinson, Jr., Atlanta, for appellants.
Moffett & Davis, F. Glenn Moffett, Jr., Atlanta, for appellee.
Syllabus Opinion by the Court
Where an employee, during her lunch hour, goes to a lounge on the premises provided by the employer where lunches can be eaten but to which employees are not required to go, they being free to have their lunch where they please, and the employee is not paid during the hour taken for lunch, and the employee, after eating lunch, washes her hands in restroom facilities adjacent to the lounge, returns to the lounge to sit in a chair where she intended to smoke a cigarette, and the chair slipped out from under her, resulting in the alleged injury, the Board of Workmen's Compensation was authorized to find that the accidental injury to the employee did not occur during the course of her employment. Ocean Accident &c. Corp. v. Farr, 180 Ga. 266, 178 S.E. 728; Austin v. General Accident Fire &c. Corp., 56 Ga.App. 481, 193 S.E. 86. While it may be true that where an employee under the same circumstances has finished lunch and is returning to the place of employment for work and is injured while so returning, the employee may be entitled to compensation (Employers' etc., Assur. Corp. v. Woodward, 53 Ga.App. 778, 187 S.E. 142; Indemnity Ins. Co. v. Westmoreland, 93 Ga.App. 888, 891, 93 S.E.2d 193; Chandler v. General Accident &c. Assur. Corp., 101 Ga.App. 597, 114 S.E.2d 438), the evidence here does not demand a finding that the employee here was returning to her place of work or that the injury arose out of and in the course of her employment, even though the lounge restrooms were used for the purpose of keeping employees neat and tidy as an element of their employment. Accordingly, the judge of the superior court on appeal erred in reversing the award and remanding the case to the Board of Workmen's Compensation.
Judgment reversed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Frett v. State Farm Emp. Workers' Comp.
...Ga. App. 187, 223 S.E.2d 236 (1976) ; Wilkie v. Travelers Ins. Co., 124 Ga. App. 714, 185 S.E.2d 783 (1971) ; Travelers Ins. Co. v. Mimbs, 120 Ga. App. 599, 171 S.E.2d 659 (1969) ; Hanson v. Globe Indem. Co., 85 Ga. App. 179, 68 S.E.2d 179 (1951) ; Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Honea, 71 Ga. App......
-
Wilkie v. Travelers Ins. Co.
...Co., 85 Ga.App. 179, 68 S.E.2d 179; McCord v. Employers Liab. Assur. Corp., 96 Ga.App. 35, 99 S.E.2d 327; Travelers Ins. Co. v. Mimbs, 120 Ga.App. 599, 600, 171 S.E.2d 659. See also United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Skinner, 188 Ga. 823, 5 S.E.2d 9; Ralph v. Great American Indem. Co., 70 Ga......
-
Twin City Fire Ins. Co. v. Graham
...Co., 85 Ga.App. 179, 68 S.E.2d 179; McCord v. Employers Liability Assur. Corp., 96 Ga.App. 35, 99 S.E.2d 327; Travelers Ins. Co. v. Mimbs, 120 Ga.App. 599, 171 S.E.2d 659; Wilkie v. Travelers Ins. Co., 124 Ga.App. 714, 185 S.E.2d 783), yet, where, as in the present case, there is evidence t......
- Brantley v. State, 44800