Traylor v. State

Citation101 Ind. 65
Decision Date14 March 1885
Docket Number11,899
PartiesTraylor v. The State
CourtSupreme Court of Indiana

From the Pike Circuit Court.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial.

F. B Posey, J. W. Wilson, W. R. Gardner and S. H. Taylor, for appellant.

F. T Hord, Attorney General, E. A. Ely and W. F. Townsend, for the State.

OPINION

Niblack J.

This was a prosecution for procuring an abortion, which resulted in the death of the pregnant woman. R. S. 1881, section 1923. The indictment was in two counts.

The first charged that "Thomas Traylor, on the 30th day of September, 1883, at and in the county of Pike, and State of Indiana, did then and there, unlawfully, feloniously and wilfully, employ and use a certain instrument, to the grand jurors unknown, in and upon one Anna Poe, who was then and there a woman pregnant with child, and did then and there unlawfully, feloniously and wilfully, introduce said instrument into the womb of the said Anna Poe, with intent then and there, and thereby, to procure and produce the miscarriage of the said Anna Poe, the said Thomas Traylor then and there well knowing that said use of said instrument would produce such miscarriage, and it not being necessary then and there to produce such miscarriage for the preservation of the life of the said Anna Poe, by reason whereof the said Anna Poe languished until the 1st day of October, 1883, and then and there died. And so the grand jurors aforesaid, on their oath aforesaid, do charge and present that the said Thomas Traylor, in manner and form and by the means aforesaid, did then and there, unlawfully and feloniously, kill and murder her, the said Anna Poe.

The second count was in its averments substantially similar to the first, except that it charged Traylor with having administered to Anna Poe a certain noxious substance, to the grand jurors unknown, for the purpose of procuring and producing her miscarriage.

Verdict, finding the defendant guilty as charged, assessing a fine of $ 250 against him and directing that he be imprisoned in the State's prison for the period of seven years. Motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment were severally overruled, and judgment on the verdict.

The first question made here is upon the sufficiency of the indictment upon the motion in arrest of judgment. In opposition to its sufficiency, it is argued that both counts contained, first, a distinct charge of using unlawful means to procure a miscarriage, and, second, an allegation of facts constituting the crime of involuntary manslaughter, and hence that both were bad for duplicity.

The indictment was not entirely formal in all its parts, and in its structure was somewhat anomalous, but we do not regard either count as having been bad for duplicity. As we construe the concluding paragraphs of both counts, they amounted only to mere specific averments that the death of Anna Poe resulted from the respective efforts of Traylor to procure her miscarriage, and consequently not to charges of involuntary manslaughter, within the purview of section 1908, R. S. 1881. Montgomery v. State, 80 Ind. 338 (41 Am. R. 815); Wood v. State, 92 Ind. 269; State v. Barker, 28 Ohio St. 583.

The next question made for our decision is upon the alleged insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict. It was shown by the evidence that Anna Poe at the time of her death was an unmarried woman about twenty-three years old; that Traylor was an unmarried man...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • State v. Siciliano, A--229
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • June 29, 1955
    ...274; 1 Am. Jur., Abortion, §§ 9, 27, pp. 135, 141, 142; Commonwealth v. Viera, 329 Mass. 470, 109 N.E.2d 171 (Sup.Jud.Ct.1952); Traylor v. State, 101 Ind. 65, 68 (Sup.Ct. of Jud.1884); Commonwealth v. Smalansky, 64 Dauph. 310, 316 (Pa. O. & T. Dauphin Cty. 1953); Commonwealth v. Lawton, 14 ......
  • B.S. v. State
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • February 8, 2012
    ...she advocates for the dismissal of both charges. Op. p. 625–26.19 See, e.g., Montgomery v. State, 80 Ind. 338 (Ind.1881) ; Traylor v. State, 101 Ind. 65 (Ind.1885) ; Seifert v. State, 160 Ind. 464, 67 N.E. 100 (1903) ; Carter v. State, 172 Ind. 227, 87 N.E. 1081 (1909) ; Swanson v. State, 5......
  • Hauk v. The State
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • February 16, 1897
    ...been produced, and the means by which it had been brought about. This certainly tended to prove the corpus delicti as defined in Traylor v. State, 101 Ind. 65. See, People v. Aikin, 66 Mich. 460, 11 Am. St. 512, 33 N.W. 821. The evidence was competent, its weight being a question for the co......
  • Holland v. State
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • May 13, 1892
    ...there can be no doubt as to the force and effect of the allegation. Our conclusion is fully sustained by the decided cases. Traylor v. State, 101 Ind. 65;Rhodes v. State, 128 Ind. 189, 27 N. E. Rep. 866; Willey v. State, 46 Ind. 363. No question upon the ruling denying a change of venue is ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT