Tree of Life Christian Sch. v. City of Upper Arlington
Decision Date | 18 May 2016 |
Docket Number | No. 14–3469.,14–3469. |
Citation | 823 F.3d 365 |
Parties | TREE OF LIFE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. CITY OF UPPER ARLINGTON, Defendant–Appellee. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit |
ARGUED: Erik W. Stanley, Alliance Defending Freedom, Scottsdale, Arizona, for Appellant. Mark D. Landes, Isaac, Wiles, Burkholder & Teetor, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Erik W. Stanley, Alliance Defending Freedom, Scottsdale, Arizona, Philip Gerth, Daniel J. Skinner, Todd A. Fichtenberg, Gerth & Skinner, LLC, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellant. Mark D. Landes, Craig R. Mayton, Scyld D. Anderson, Isaac, Wiles, Burkholder & Teetor, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellee. Philip K. Hartman, Yazan S. Ashrawi, Frost Brown Todd, LLC, Columbus, Ohio, James C. Becker, Columbus, Ohio, for Amici Curiae.
Before: BOGGS, SUHRHEINRICH, and WHITE, Circuit Judges.
, J., delivered the opinion of the court in which SUHRHEINRICH, J., joined, and WHITE, J., joined in part. WHITE, J. (pp. 373–82), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.
OPINIONBOGGS
, Circuit Judge.
Defendant–Appellee Upper Arlington (the government), a suburb of Columbus, Ohio, regulated the use of land owned by Plaintiff–Appellant Tree of Life Christian Schools (TOL Christian Schools). As a result of this regulation, TOL Christian Schools could not use its land to operate a religious school. TOL Christian Schools, after corresponding with and applying to the government on related proposals, applied to rezone the property to allow use as a religious school. The government denied the application because such a use would not accord with certain aspects of the government's Master Plan. In its denial, the government focused on the Master Plan's provision that the government maintain zoning for commercial uses in order to maximize its income-tax revenue.
After the denial, TOL Christian Schools filed this suit. The suit primarily claims, under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000cc
—2000cc–5, that the government illegally failed to treat TOL Christian Schools on equal terms with nonreligious assemblies or institutions. After both parties moved for summary judgment, the district court granted summary judgment to the government. This was error.
Although the record in this case is complex, we can summarize our view briefly. TOL Christian Schools purchased the largest office building in Upper Arlington, unused at the time of the purchase, and attempted to negotiate with the government to open a religious school. The government refused to strike a deal with TOL Christian Schools in hopes, apparently unfounded, that the property's former occupant, AOL/Time Warner (or its equivalent), would return. Such a result, the government officials further hoped, would mark the first step in a plan to increase services by increasing personal-income-tax revenues without allowing multifamily, retail, or commercial use of land currently zoned for only single-family residential use.
Anticipating controversies similar to this one, and affirming its commitment to protecting religious freedom, Congress enacted RLUIPA, which provides, among other things, that “[n]o government shall impose or implement a land use regulation in a manner that treats a religious assembly or institution on less than equal terms with a nonreligious assembly or institution.” 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc(b)(1)
. Different circuits interpret this provision differently. Some circuits have held that a land-use regulation must treat “similarly situated” religious and nonreligious assemblies and institutions equally. The Eleventh Circuit has held that a government land-use regulation that discriminates against a religious assembly or institution in comparison to any nonreligious assembly or institution is invalid unless it is narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling government interest.
Under any approach, the issue in this case is whether the government treats nonreligious assemblies or institutions that would fail to maximize income-tax revenue in the same way it has treated the proposed religious school. That is a factual, not a legal, question. Federal courts may not resolve genuine issues of material fact on motions for summary judgment, even in proceedings for equitable relief. So, the district court's grant of summary judgment to the government was error. We reverse the judgment of the district court and remand. We explain more fully our reasoning below.
In 2009, AOL/Time Warner, a media company not party to this litigation, vacated an office building located at 5000 Arlington Centre Boulevard in Upper Arlington. The same year, TOL Christian Schools, a school with several campuses across the Columbus area supported by local churches, began negotiations that would conclude in August 2010 with its purchase of the property at 5000 Arlington Centre Boulevard.
Upper Arlington is a primarily residential suburb. It has assembled various land-use and economic regulations in the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). The UDO zones Upper Arlington. The UDO provides for seven criteria to “be followed in approving zoning map amendments to the UDO.” UDO § 4.04(C). One of those criteria provides “[t]hat the proposed zoning district classification and use of the land will generally conform with the master plan.” Id. § 4.04(C)(5).
centers, [and] hospitals....
UDO § 5.03(A)(6). The ORC District includes 5000 Arlington Centre Boulevard.
Chad Gibson, Staff Report to Upper Arlington City Council (Nov. 25, 2013) (emphasis added). In addition, the City Attorney spoke to the City Council, focusing on the fact “that rezoning to eliminate commercially zoned property would be contrary to the master plan.” Tree of Life Christian Schs., 16 F.Supp.3d at 892
. Based on Gibson's report and the City Attorney's comments, “the Council denied [TOL Christian Schools]'s rezoning request” on December 9, 2013. Ibid.
On February 11, 2014, TOL Christian Schools moved for summary judgment on its claims in the district court. On March 6, 2014, Upper Arlington submitted both a memorandum opposing the motion of TOL Christian Schools and a cross-motion for summary judgment. On April 18, 2014, the district court granted summary judgment to the government, reasoning along the lines of Gibson's report. TOL Christian Schools timely appealed.
U.S. Dep't of Justice, Report on the Tenth Anniversary of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act 1 (Sept. 22, 2010).
“RLUIPA is the latest of long-running congressional efforts to accord religious exercise heightened protection from government-imposed burdens....” Cutter v. Wilkinson, 544 U.S. 709, 714, 125 S.Ct. 2113, 161 L.Ed.2d 1020 (2005)
. In 1993, Congress enacted the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). Congress sought to justify RFRA's regulation...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Signs for Jesus v. Town of Pembroke
...plaintiff has been treated less well than a similarly situated secular comparator. See generally Tree of Life Christian Schools v. City of Upper Arlington , 823 F.3d 365, 370 (6th Cir. 2016) (collecting cases). In conducting this analysis, I ask whether the proposed comparator is similarly ......
-
Lucas v. Breg, Inc.
...to determine whether a genuine dispute exists for trial, not to resolve the dispute itself. SeeTree of Life Christian Schools v. City of Upper Arlington , 823 F.3d 365, 367 (6th Cir. 2016) ("Federal courts may not resolve genuine issues of material fact on motions for summary judgment[.]");......
-
Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n v. R.G. &. G.R. Harris Funeral Homes, Inc.
...which cannot be resolved in the Funeral Home's favor at the summary-judgment stage. See Tree of Life Christian Sch. v. City of Upper Arlington , 823 F.3d 365, 371–72 (6th Cir. 2016) (holding that this court "cannot assume ... a fact" at the summary judgment stage); see also Guess? Inc. v. U......
-
Tree of Life Christian Sch. v. City of Upper Arlington
...summary judgment in favor of Upper Arlington on Tree of Life’s RLUIPA equal terms claim. Tree of LifeSch. v. City of Upper Arlington (Tree of Life II) , 823 F.3d 365, 366 (6th Cir. 2016). According to the court, Tree of Life created a genuine dispute of material fact by making unrebutted al......