Trees v. K-Mart Corp., K-M

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Florida
Citation479 So.2d 119
Docket NumberK-M
PartiesTrees (Vicki), By and Through Trees (Jewell & Jerry L.) Trees (Jewell), Trees (Jerry L.) v.art Corporation, Town of Lake Park, Cardinal (Frank), Helm (Frank), Friedman (Apul) NO. 67,168 479 So.2d 119
Decision Date31 October 1985

Page 119

479 So.2d 119
Trees (Vicki), By and Through Trees (Jewell & Jerry L.)
Trees (Jewell), Trees (Jerry L.)
v.
K-Mart Corporation, Town of Lake Park, Cardinal (Frank),
Helm (Frank), Friedman (Apul)
NO. 67,168
479 So.2d 119
Supreme Court of Florida.
OCT 31, 1985

Appeal From: 4th DCA

467 So.2d 401

Pet. for rev. den.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 practice notes
  • Saffor v. State, No. 91-2667
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • September 15, 1993
    ...absent a clear abuse of discretion. Sims, supra at 133, quoting Trees v. K-Mart Corp., 467 So.2d 401, 403 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 479 So.2d 119 (Fla.1985). The trial court in the instant case did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of a collateral crime. Both the charged off......
  • C.A. Hansen Corp. v. Wicker, Smith, Blomquist, Tutan, O'Hara, McCoy, Graham & Lane, P.A., No. 89-2800
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • July 31, 1990
    ...favor is an essential element of a malicious prosecution action. Union Oil of Cal. v. Watson, 468 So.2d 349 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied 479 So.2d 119 (Fla.1985); DeMarie v. Jefferson Stores, Inc., 442 So.2d 1014 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Weissman v. K-Mart Corp., 396 So.2d 1164 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981......
2 cases
  • Saffor v. State, No. 91-2667
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • September 15, 1993
    ...absent a clear abuse of discretion. Sims, supra at 133, quoting Trees v. K-Mart Corp., 467 So.2d 401, 403 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 479 So.2d 119 (Fla.1985). The trial court in the instant case did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of a collateral crime. Both the charged off......
  • C.A. Hansen Corp. v. Wicker, Smith, Blomquist, Tutan, O'Hara, McCoy, Graham & Lane, P.A., No. 89-2800
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • July 31, 1990
    ...favor is an essential element of a malicious prosecution action. Union Oil of Cal. v. Watson, 468 So.2d 349 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied 479 So.2d 119 (Fla.1985); DeMarie v. Jefferson Stores, Inc., 442 So.2d 1014 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Weissman v. K-Mart Corp., 396 So.2d 1164 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT