Trent v. Atlantic City Electric Co.
Decision Date | 23 July 1964 |
Docket Number | 14526.,14482,No. 14481,14481 |
Citation | 334 F.2d 847 |
Parties | James R. TRENT (Plaintiff) v. ATLANTIC CITY ELECTRIC CO., Gibbs and Hill, Inc. and Deepwater Operating Co. (Defendants) and Atlantic City Electric Co. (Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff), v. GARDEN STATE CONSTRUCTION CO., Atlantic City Electric Co. and Deepwater Operating Co., Appellants. James R. TRENT (Plaintiff) v. ATLANTIC CITY ELECTRIC CO., Gibbs and Hill, Inc. and Deepwater Operating Co. (Defendants) and Atlantic City Electric Co. (Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff), v. GARDEN STATE CONSTRUCTION CO., Atlantic City Electric Co., Appellant. James R. TRENT (Plaintiff) v. ATLANTIC CITY ELECTRIC CO., Gibbs and Hill, Inc., and Deepwater Operating Co. (Defendants) and Atlantic City Electric Co. (Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff), v. GARDEN STATE CONSTRUCTION CO., Gibbs and Hill, Inc., Appellant. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit |
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
Milton M. Borowsky, Philadelphia, Pa. (Abraham E. Freedman, Freedman, Landy & Lorry, Philadelphia, Pa., Sidney A. Brass, Newark, N. J., on the brief), for James R. Trent.
Herbert Horn, Atlantic City, N. J., (Lloyd, Horn, Megargee & Steedle, Atlantic City, N. J., McCord, Farrell & Eynon, by Sidney P. McCord, Jr., Haddonfield, N. J., on the brief), for Atlantic City Electric Co., Gibbs and Hill, Inc., and Deepwater Operating Co.
Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and FORMAN and GANEY, Circuit Judges.
This is an appeal by the defendants, Atlantic City Electric Company ("Electric Company"), Deepwater Operating Company ("Deepwater"), and Gibbs and Hill, Inc. ("Gibbs and Hill") from a judgment of $350,000. in favor of the plaintiff, James R. Trent, for injuries sustained as the result of an accident which occurred on November 15, 1956. The Electric Company as third party plaintiff has also appealed a judgment of no cause of action respecting its claim against the third party defendant, Garden State Construction Company ("Garden State").
Jurisdiction in the case at bar is based on diversity of citizenship and the law of New Jersey governs. The background facts are somewhat complex and need not be set out in full. The basic facts will be detailed in the paragraphs immediately following. Additional facts will be set out as required in the discussion of the particular issues.
(A) The Electric Company was the owner of the buildings and equipment of a power plant located at Deepwater, New Jersey. This plant furnished electricity to customers in the area. It was operated by Deepwater which was a wholly owned subsidiary of the Electric Company.
In January 1956 the Electric Company decided to have the capacity of the Deepwater plant expanded. On January 6, 1956 the Electric Company entered into a contract with Gibbs and Hill under which the latter agreed to perform the engineering and construction services on the Deepwater project. Gibbs and Hill was an engineering company engaged in construction.
On March 21, 1956 Garden State contracted with the Electric Company to perform the electrical work on the Deepwater job. Garden State was an electrical contractor. The plaintiff, Trent, was an electrician of the highest classification, i. e., that of "journeyman," who was to be employed by Garden State on the Deepwater project.
The contract between the Electric Company and Gibbs and Hill in pertinent part provided:
* * * * *
* * * * *
The contract between the Electric Company and Garden State was prepared for the company by Gibbs and Hill. In relevant part it provided:
* * * * *
* * * * *
Additionally the Electric Company-Garden State contract provided that a certain work-specifications document to be prepared by Gibbs and Hill was to form an integral part of the agreement. This document in pertinent part provided: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Dunn v. HOVIC
...United States v. Logan, 717 F.2d 84, 91 (3d Cir.1983) (absent objection, charge reviewed for plain error only); Trent v. Atlantic City Elec. Co., 334 F.2d 847, 859 (3d Cir.1964) see App. at 1778, 1779, 1783, and the district court responded to OCF's objection on those grounds only. See App.......
-
U.S. v. 564.54 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Monroe and Pike Counties, Com. of Pa.
...would result in a miscarriage of justice. 3 Though this discretionary power should be exercised sparingly, Trent v. Atlantic City Electric Co., 334 F.2d 847, 859 (3d Cir. 1964); Mazer v. Lipschutz, 327 F.2d 42, 52 (3d Cir. 1964), we think it is exercised appropriately in this case. As the f......
-
William Dunn, Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp. v. Hovic
...States v. Logan, 717 F.2d 84, 91 (3d Cir. 1983) (absent objection, charge reviewed for plain error only); Trent v. Atlantic City Elec. Co., 334 F.2d 847, 859 (3d Cir. 1964) (same).B. Constitutional Law OCF also argues that the charge was constitutionally infirm. It complains of the trial co......
-
McDermott v. Party City Corp.
...the failure to review a legally incorrect jury instruction would result in a miscarriage of justice). But see Trent v. Atlantic City Elec. Co., 334 F.2d 847, 859 (3d Cir.1964) (concluding that the court need not consider the contested instruction because "the evidence was more than sufficie......