Treppeda v. Treppeda

CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
Writing for the CourtBefore LAWRENCE
CitationTreppeda v. Treppeda, 622 N.Y.S.2d 749, 212 A.D.2d 592 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Decision Date14 February 1995
PartiesCharles P. TREPPEDA, Appellant, v. Joyce H. TREPPEDA, Respondent.

Marshall S. Goldman, P.C., White Plains, for appellant.

John H. Hersh, Peekskill (Michele A. Silva, of counsel), for respondent.

Before LAWRENCE, J.P., and RITTER, FRIEDMANN and KRAUSMAN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

In an action for divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Miller, J.), entered March 11, 1993, which, inter alia, granted a divorce to the defendant on her counterclaim, awarded custody of the children to the defendant, awarded child support to the defendant, and distributed the marital property.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff contends that he was deprived of a fair trial after his attorney failed to appear for trial and the court conducted the trial without permitting the plaintiff a reasonable time to retain new counsel.

The record reveals that the trial in this case was conducted on two separate days. On the first day of the trial, the plaintiff, without the aid of counsel, withdrew his complaint. However, the defendant maintained her counterclaim for divorce, and, at the conclusion of the testimony, the defendant's counterclaim was granted. Prior to hearing the evidence, the court specifically asked the plaintiff if he was representing himself, and the plaintiff replied in the affirmative. The court adjourned the trial five days to permit the plaintiff to retain new counsel and to give the parties an opportunity to reach a settlement on the remaining issues. Upon reconvening the trial, despite the court's offer to further adjourn the matter in order for the plaintiff to retain counsel, the plaintiff indicated that he intended to retain co...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • Benson Park Associates, LLC v. Herman
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 6, 2010
    ...K., 59 A.D.3d 240, 875 N.Y.S.2d 3 [2009], lv. denied 12 N.Y.3d 711, 882 N.Y.S.2d 397, 909 N.E.2d 1235 [2009]; Treppeda v. Treppeda, 212 A.D.2d 592, 622 N.Y.S.2d 749 [1995] ). While in support of the motion to vacate the default, defendant claimed that he had had a "previously scheduled enga......
  • Raji v. Raji
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 26, 1996
    ...hearing, the referee properly exercised her discretion in refusing defendant an adjournment to obtain counsel (see, Treppeda v. Treppeda, 212 A.D.2d 592, 622 N.Y.S.2d 749). Defendant was properly deemed in default for willful refusal to proceed and thereby forfeited his right to participate......
  • Cindy L.S. v. v. David L.S.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 17, 1998
    ...sound discretion of the trial court (see, Jadar Development Corp., v. Greenspan, 230 A.D.2d 828, 646 N.Y.S.2d 828; Treppeda v. Treppeda, 212 A.D.2d 592, 622 N.Y.S.2d 749), under these circumstances the court improvidently denied the husband's single request for an adjournment to enable him ......
  • Natoli v. Natoli
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 30, 1996
    ...of the trial court (see, Matter of Anthony M., 63 N.Y.2d 270, 283, 481 N.Y.S.2d 675, 471 N.E.2d 447; see also, Treppeda v. Treppeda, 212 A.D.2d 592, 622 N.Y.S.2d 749; Cuevas v. Cuevas, 110 A.D.2d 873, 877, 488 N.Y.S.2d 725). In deciding such applications the court must "indulge in a balance......
  • Get Started for Free