Triplett v. Commonwealth
Decision Date | 18 January 1938 |
Citation | 272 Ky. 714,114 S.W.2d 1108 |
Parties | TRIPLETT v. COMMONWEALTH. |
Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
Rehearing Denied April 19, 1938.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Letcher County.
Troy Triplett was convicted of murder, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
John D W. Collins, of Whitesburg, for appellant.
Hubert Meredith, Atty. Gen., and W. Owen Keller, Asst. Atty. Gen for the Commonwealth.
Troy Triplett has appealed from a judgment convicting him of the crime of murder, and sentencing him to death.He seeks a reversal of the judgment on two grounds: (1) The punishment is excessive; and (2)the trial court erred in permitting the Commonwealth to introduce evidence in chief after it had closed its case and the defendant had testified.
Appellant shot and killed Dolphy Hall in Letcher countyJuly 16, 1937.Hall was 13 years of age.When appellant was arraigned, he entered a plea of "not guilty," but, when the case was called for trial, he withdrew this plea and entered a plea of "guilty" to the indictment charging him with the crime of murder; thus leaving to the jury only the duty of fixing his punishment at life imprisonment or death.The Commonwealth, as it had a right to do, introduced evidence showing the circumstances attending the killing in order to enable the jury to fix the punishment intelligently.Cornelison v. Com.,84 Ky. 583, 2 S.W. 235, 8 Ky.Law Rep. 793;Holtman v. Com.,129 Ky. 710, 112 S.W 851.John Henry Addington, the first witness introduced by the Commonwealth, testified that on the day of the homicide he, Dolphy Hall, and Paul Akeman crossed the mountain to pick huckleberries, but found the berries were not ripe and returned to the foot of the mountain, where they were joined by Troy Triplett, Homer Rose, and Harrison Spurgeon.Triplett was angry because the Hall boy had testified against him in some court proceeding, and, in the presence of the witness, said, in substance, that he was going to kill Hall.Triplett, Hall, and the others walked down the road to a point where a path led across the hill.Hall, Addington, and Akeman turned into the path, and Triplett ran up to them and said: "You are going down the road."They turned and accompanied Triplett and Rose to Brack Quillen's home, where Addington and Akeman turned and started back.Triplett again ran up to them and said: "You are going with us."They continued down the road to the mouth of Webb branch, and then to the home of Arlie Vanover.Addington told Triplett he wanted a drink of water, and Triplett said he would go in the house and get it.While he was absent, Dolphy Hall walked into the house, but Triplett took hold of his arm and led him back to the road.When Triplett gave the water to Addington, he said: "Take a good cold drink, that is all you will need until you get one in Hell."They continued down the road, appellant complaining all the while because Dolphy Hall had testified against him.He threatened several times to kill the Hall boy.Addington testified as follows concerning what Triplett said and did when whey reached the place where the killing took place:
Paul Akeman, a boy 13 years of age, testified to substantially the same facts except that he did not see the whole transaction as he ran when the first shot was fired.The only other witness introduced by the Commonwealth was Jesse Holbrook.He reached the scene of the killing about thirty minutes after it occurred, and found the mule lying in the road and Dolphy Hall on the bank by the side of the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
State v. Brown
... ... to such information. State v. Best, supra, Loucks v. State, ... Supra; 22 C.J.S. Sec. 58, pp. 122-123; Commonwealth v ... Trippi, (Mass.) 167 N.E. 354; Patterson v. The ... People, 46 Barbour S.C. Rep. 633; Swain v. State ... (Ind.) 18 N.E.2d 921; Rosier ... 632; 83 ... L.Ed. 406; 59 S.Ct. 154; Reppin v. People, 95 Colo ... 192, 34 P.2d 71; Triplett v. Commonwealth, 272 Ky ... 714; 114 S.W.2d 1108; Houston v. Commonwealth, 270 ... Ky. 125, 109 S.W.2d 45; Cornelison v. Commonwealth, ... ...
-
Hurley v. Com.
...heard the jury was authorized to reach the verdict it rendered. Vance v. Com., 254 Ky. 667, 72 S.W.2d 43 (1934). Cf. Triplett v. Com., 272 Ky. 714, 114 S.W.2d 1108 (1938). Hurley says that under the instructions given by the court the jury had no alternative but to convict for murder once i......
-
Com. v. Johnson
...trial. Gall v. Commonwealth, Ky., 607 S.W.2d 97 (1980); Hayes v. Commonwealth, Ky., 470 S.W.2d 601 (1971); and Triplett v. Commonwealth, 272 Ky. 714, 114 S.W.2d 1108 (1938). As such, we have encountered no authority which directly controls the issue In death penalty cases, jury sentencing i......
- Atlas Coal Co. v. Wylie