Tripp v. Scholz
| Docket Number | 16-3469 |
| Decision Date | 06 October 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
57 cases
-
Planned Parenthood of Ind. & Ky., Inc. v. Marion Cnty. Prosecutor
...the party against whom the motion at issue was made.’ " Valenti v. Lawson , 889 F.3d 427, 429 (7th Cir. 2018) (quoting Tripp v. Scholz , 872 F.3d 857, 862 (7th Cir. 2017) ). The movant is entitled to summary judgment when there is "no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant i......
-
Whitfield v. Thurston
...signatures equaling 5% of the same, though neither candidate was required to file more than 500 signatures); Tripp v. Scholz , 872 F.3d 857, 861, 871-72 (7th Cir. 2017) (holding that Illinois's 5% signature requirement for new parties and 90-day petitioning window did not violate the First ......
-
Woodring v. Jackson Cnty., 20-1881
...viewing the facts and drawing reasonable inferences in favor of "the party against whom the motion at issue was made." Tripp v. Scholz , 872 F.3d 857, 862 (7th Cir. 2017).A. Standing Standing requires (1) an injury in fact that is (2) caused by the defendant's conduct and (3) redressable by......
-
Libertarian Party of Ark. v. Thurston
...State of Arkansas cites many other instances where federal courts upheld signature requirement ballot access laws. See Tripp v. Scholz , 872 F.3d 857, 860 (7th Cir. 2017) (holding that a five percent requirement for political parties did not create an unconstitutional burden); Swanson v. Wo......
Request a trial to view additional results