Troupe v. State, 55152

Decision Date31 January 1989
Docket NumberNo. 55152,55152
Citation766 S.W.2d 722
PartiesLarry TROUPE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Lucy A. Liggett, Asst. Public Defender, Clayton, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., John P. Pollard, Asst. Attys. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

CRIST, Judge.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The conviction sought to be vacated followed movant's guilty pleas to burglary in the second degree, possession of heroin, and four counts of stealing-third offense. He was sentenced in the aggregate to eighteen years' imprisonment. We affirm.

Movant contends the trial court erred in denying him an evidentiary hearing on his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. In his 27.26 motion, movant alleged his counsel was not adequately prepared for trial; he did not discuss the facts of the case with movant or consult with him; and he promised movant a different sentence than he ultimately received.

In order to be entitled to an evidentiary hearing, movant must allege facts, not conclusions, which warrant relief, are not refuted by the record, and result in prejudice to movant. Chapman v. State, 720 S.W.2d 17, 18 (Mo.App.1986). Following a guilty plea, ineffective assistance of counsel is only relevant if it affected the voluntariness of the plea. Gawne v. State, 729 S.W.2d 497, 499 (Mo.App.1987).

A review of the transcript of the guilty pleas refutes each of movant's allegations. When questioned by the trial judge, movant stated he had consulted with his attorney concerning his case and was satisfied with his representation. After hearing the recommended sentences, mo...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Cole v. State
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 8 Abril 1993
    ...matters complained of must have resulted in prejudice to movant. Broyles v. State, 785 S.W.2d 685, 687 (Mo.App.1990); Troupe v. State, 766 S.W.2d 722, 723 (Mo.App.1989); Chapman v. State, 720 S.W.2d 17, 18 In his Amended Motion, appellant "asserts that had he been properly advised of the ra......
  • Wilkins v. State
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 9 Enero 1991
    ...is only relevant in a motion for postconviction relief to the extent it affects the voluntariness of the movant's plea. Troupe v. State, 766 S.W.2d 722, 723 (Mo.App.1989). This requires that the defendant prove his counsel's performance was deficient and that prejudice resulted from the def......
  • White v. State, 56310
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 31 Octubre 1989
    ...a guilty plea, ineffective assistance of counsel is relevant only if it affected the voluntariness of the plea. Troupe v. State, 766 S.W.2d 722, 723 (Mo.App., E.D.1989). Our review of the motion court's decision is limited to determining whether its findings and conclusions are clearly erro......
  • Rippee v. State, 16466
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 30 Abril 1990
    ...must not be refuted by the record; and the matters complained about must have resulted in prejudice to the prisoner. Troupe v. State, 766 S.W.2d 722, 723 (Mo.App.1989); Sand v. State, 762 S.W.2d 97, 98 Movant's 24.035 motion did not plead there was any agreement that no other charges would ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT