Trs. of Cent. Methodist Episcopal Church v. Harris

CourtConnecticut Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtCARPENTER, J.
CitationTrs. of Cent. Methodist Episcopal Church v. Harris, 25 A. 456, 62 Conn. 93 (Conn. 1892)
Decision Date30 June 1892
PartiesTRUSTEES OF CENTRAL METHODIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH v. HARRIS.

Case reserved from superior court, New London county.

Action by the trustees of the Central Methodist Episcopal Church against George W. Harris, administrator of the estate of Mary Ann Ripley, deceased, to recover property claimed under the will of Hezekiah Ripley. Case reserved to this court. Judgment for defendant.

S. Lucas, for plaintiffs.

F. T. Brown, for defendant.

CARPENTER, J. Hezekiah Ripley died, leaving a will in which is the following provision: "I give, bequeath, and devise all the rest and residue of my estate, both real and personal, to my beloved wife, Mary Ann Ripley, and to her heirs for ever: provided, that whatever of the same, if any, she may leave, not used by her for her support and comfort, I give and bequeath to said Central M. E. Church, to be paid to the worn-out preachers and their widows and orphans of the Methodist Episcopal Church, and the missions of said M. E. Church, in equal proportions, share and share alike." Mrs. Ripley is now dead, leaving a portion of the property so bequeathed to her. This suit is to recover that property if the plaintiffs are entitled to recover, some questions arise as to the validity of the gift to them. But, as we are of the opinion that the gift over to them is inoperative, we have no occasion to consider those questions....

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • Middleton v. Dudding
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • February 9, 1916
    ...61 L. R. A. 455; Yocum v. Siler, 160 Mo. loc. cit. 288, 61 S. W. 208; Kelly v. Hogan, 71 App. Div. 343, 76 N. Y. Supp. 5; Trustees v. Harris, 62 Conn. 93, 25 Atl. 456. The two rules are simply counterparts of each other, and have been established in every well-considered case in this state,......
  • Armor v. Frey
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 15, 1910
    ... ... Shelton, 67 Conn. 390; Central ... v. Harris, 62 Conn. 93; Browning v. Southworth, ... 74 ... ...
  • Widows' Home v. Lippardt
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • June 21, 1904
    ...Van Horne v. Campbell, 100 N.Y. 287; Howard v. Carusi, 109 U.S. 725; Rona v. Meier, 47 Ia. 607; Alden v. Johnson, 63 Ia. 125; Trustees v. Harris, 62 Conn. 93; v. Rhoades, 150 Mass. 301; Gilchrist v. Empfield, 194 Pa. 397; Page on Wills, secs. 575, 684; Underhill on Wills, secs. 358, 689. Th......
  • Dei Cas v. Mayfield
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • January 1, 1985
    ...the entire packet of rights incident to absolute ownership, making it impossible for a remainder to exist. Trustees of Methodist Church v. Harris, 62 Conn. 93, 25 A. 456 (1892); McKenzie's Appeal from Probate, 41 Conn. 607, 609 Although the principle is often stated, its application has pro......
  • Get Started for Free