Truelove v. Easley
Decision Date | 02 March 1988 |
Docket Number | No. 87-110,87-110 |
Citation | 521 So.2d 1229 |
Parties | Lynn and Terry TRUELOVE, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Appellants, v. Marvin H. EASLEY, et al., Defendants-Appellants-Appellees, Dallas H. DeSoto, et al., Third Party Defendants-Appellees. 521 So.2d 1229 |
Court | Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US |
Bolen & Erwin, Greg Erwin, Alexandria, for plaintiffs-appellees-appellants.
Sooter & Foote, Victor Sooter, Alexandria, for defendants-appellants-appellees.
Ralph Kennedy, Alexandria, defendant-appellee.
Before GUIDRY, YELVERTON and KNOLL, JJ.
Plaintiffs, Lynn and Terry Ann Truelove, filed a suit in redhibition against Marvin H. Easley, their vendor, seeking a diminution in price and attorney's fees for the sinking and cracking of the foundation of the house at 6518 Windy Drive, Pineville, Louisiana, which the Trueloves had purchased from Easley. Easley third partied Dallas and Eula DeSoto, his vendors and the builders of the house, along with Mike Dunn, a contractor who had made extensive repairs to the house following a fire. Plaintiffs subsequently amended their petition to add the DeSotos and Dunn as defendants.
The trial judge rendered judgment in favor of the Trueloves and against defendant, Easley, ordering a reduction in price in the sum of $5,940.00, being the amount expended by plaintiffs to cure the foundation defect. The court denied plaintiffs' demand for attorney's fees and dismissed all claims against the DeSotos and Dunn. Plaintiffs appealed seeking a greater reduction in price and attorney's fees. Easley also appealed urging that the trial court erred in: (1) finding redhibitory defects as to appellant, Easley; and, (2) failing to grant him indemnity and attorney's fees against third party defendants, the DeSotos and Dunn. We amend to award plaintiffs attorney's fees and otherwise affirm.
We have carefully examined the record in this case and find that the trial court, in excellent reasons for judgment, succinctly and accurately set forth the facts and disposed of all issues presented, except as concerns plaintiffs' demand for attorney's fees. Accordingly, we are pleased to adopt, in part, the learned trial judge's reasons for judgment as our opinion on appellate review.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Goodman v. Roberts
...that it was inadequacies of the installation and renovation which resulted in the defects. Under the reasoning of Truelove v. Easley, 521 So.2d 1229 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1988), writ denied, 526 So.2d 802 and 803 (La.1988), as well as that of Chastant, supra, this is sufficient involvement with ......
-
Allen v. Burnett
...existed at the time of sale. Plaintiff bears the burden of proving the vice or defect existed at the time of sale. Truelove v. Easley, 521 So.2d 1229 (La.App. 3d Cir.1988). A plaintiff must also prove that the defect could not have been discovered by ordinary inspection. Reynoir v. Successi......
-
94-1194 La.App. 3 Cir. 3/1/95, Sydnes v. Harwell
...sale price and the price a reasonable buyer and seller would have agreed upon if they had known of the defects." Truelove v. Easley, 521 So.2d 1229, 1233 (La.App. 3d Cir.), writs denied, 526 So.2d 802, 803 (La.1988) (citations omitted). The supreme court in Pursell, supra, created an except......
-
95-200 La.App. 5 Cir. 11/15/95, Cruz v. Bertucci
...in a fire was not easily discoverable by plaintiffs; (5) relying on the testimony of plaintiffs' expert witness; (6) relying on Truelove v. Easley, 521 So.2d 1229 (La.App. [95-200 La.App. 5 Cir. 2] 3rd Cir.1988) in reaching its conclusion, and (7) casting Bertucci Realty, Inc. in LA-C.C. ar......