Trujillo v. Patterson, 9209.
| Decision Date | 18 April 1967 |
| Docket Number | No. 9209.,9209. |
| Citation | Trujillo v. Patterson, 389 F.2d 1003 (10th Cir. 1967) |
| Parties | Fred Guadalupe TRUJILLO, Appellant, v. Wayne K. PATTERSON, Warden Colorado State Penitentiary, Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit |
Lowell M. Fortune, Denver, Colo., for appellant.
Paul D. Rubner, Denver, Colo., for appellee.
Before BREITENSTEIN and HILL, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, District Judge.
The trial judge, in his order denying the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, very ably stated the case, the issues involved and his reasons for denying the writ. We are in complete agreement with the trial judge and affirm the order of dismissal upon the grounds set forth therein. 266 F.Supp. 901.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
3 cases
-
Trujillo v. People
...Trujillo v. Patterson, 266 F.Supp. 901 (D.C. Colo.). Defendant then appealed this decision and it was affirmed in Trujillo v. Patterson, 389 F.2d 1003 (10th Cir.). Three years later, in August 1969, defendant filed his third 35(b) motion with the trial court. Besides once again raising the ......
-
05CA0169
...imposition of two sentences to run consecutively was lawful and did not constitute a violation of any federally protected right), aff’d, 389 F.2d 1003 (10th Cir. 1967). 20 21The judgment of conviction and sentence as to first degree burglary based on assault are vacated. The other judgments......
- Manderacchi v. United States, 11574.