Trullinger v. Howe
Decision Date | 14 February 1911 |
Citation | 113 P. 4,58 Or. 73 |
Parties | TRULLINGER et al. v. HOWE. |
Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Yamhill County; William Galloway, Judge.
Contempt proceeding against D.P. Trullinger and another in an action by D.P. Trullinger and another against W.A. Howe, doing business as the Carlton Lumber Company. From an order overruling a demurrer and adjudging that plaintiffs pay a fine of $50, plaintiffs appeal. Reversed and remanded.
This is a contempt proceeding against plaintiffs, based upon the following motion and affidavits, filed December 16, 1907:
Several other...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Jones v. Jones
...v. Superior Court, 113 Cal.App.2d 880, 249 P.2d 299 (1952); Young v. Superior Court, 69 Cal.App. 281, 231 P. 347 (1924); Trullinger v. Howe, 58 Or. 73, 113 P. 4 (1911); State ex rel. Oregon State Bar v. Lenske, Or., 405 P.2d 510 The clerk's affidavit failed to state a prima facie case again......
-
City of Klamath Falls v. Bailey, 78-22
...the violation of a decree are quasi-criminal and the statutory provision relating thereto must be strictly complied with. Trullinger v. Howe, 58 Or. 73, 113 P. 4 (1911); State v. Mount, 139 Or. 694, 10 P.2d 606 (1932). Accord: In re Westerfield, 285 Or. 615, 592 P.2d 549 Inasmuch as the mun......
-
State ex rel. Perry v. Mount
...the statutory provision relating thereto must be strictly complied with. State ex rel. v. Sieber, 49 Or. 1, 4, 88 P. 313; Trullinger v. Howe, 58 Or. 73, 79, 113 P. 4. See C.J. 57, § 81; Rapalje on Contempt, 25 § 21. We think it would be the better practice where the district attorney does n......
-
Taylor v. Gladden
...irregularity. The case is distinguishable from State ex rel. Hewson v. Hewson, 129 Or. 612, 277 P. 1012, 63 A.L.R. 1216, and Trullinger v. Howe, 58 Or. 73, 113 P. 4, both indirect contempts, where it was held that omissions of the state as a party from the title of the cause rendered the af......