Trump v. Hawaii

Docket Number17-965
Decision Date26 June 2018

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
611 cases
  • Almakalani v. McAleenan
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • March 16, 2021
    ...inquiry when the denial of a visa allegedly burdens the constitutional rights of a U.S. citizen." Trump v. Hawaii , ––– U.S. ––––, 138 S. Ct. 2392, 2420, 201 L.Ed.2d 775 (2018). In such cases, courts apply rational basis review and "will uphold the policy so long as it can reasonably be und......
  • Citizens for Quality Educ. San Diego v. Barrera
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
    • September 25, 2018
    ...that he is ‘directly affected by the laws and practices against which [his] complaints are directed.’ " Trump v. Hawaii , ––– U.S. ––––, 138 S.Ct. 2392, 2416, 201 L.Ed.2d 775 (2018) (quoting Sch. Dist. of Abington Twp. v. Schempp , 374 U.S. 203, 224 n.9, 83 S.Ct. 1560, 10 L.Ed.2d 844 (1963)......
  • Ramos v. Nielsen
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
    • August 6, 2018
    ...dismiss the equal protection claim ruling, see Docket No. 34, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Trump v. Hawaii , 585 U.S. ––––, 138 S.Ct. 2392, 201 L.Ed.2d 775 (2018). This Court thereafter invited supplemental briefing whether to reconsider its earlier holding. For the reasons......
  • Marland v. Trump
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • October 30, 2020
    ...drawn into question."); Hawaii v. Trump , 878 F.3d 662, 680-81 (9th Cir. 2017), rev'd on other grounds , Trump v. Hawaii , ––– U.S. ––––, 138 S. Ct. 2392, 201 L.Ed.2d 775 (2018) (finding final agency action reviewable under the APA, despite the fact that this agency action was implementing ......
  • Get Started for Free
7 firm's commentaries
  • A Sur-Reply on Originalism
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • July 2, 2023
    ...83, 94 (1968). [7] 60 U.S. 393 (1857), superseded by U.S. Const. amend. XIV (1868). [8] 323 U.S. 214 (1944), abrogated by Trump v. Hawaii, 138 S. Ct. 2392 (2018). [9] Dred Scott, 60 U.S. at 405. [10] Id. at 407. [11] 320 U.S. 81 (1943). [12] Id. at 100 (citations omitted). [13] Id. at 101. ......
  • Last Day of 2020 Immigration Decision, Proclamation
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • January 1, 2021
    ...§ 1182(f) (`§ 212(f)’), `grants the President broad discretion to suspend the entry of aliens into the United States,’ Trump v. Hawaii, 138 S. Ct. 2392, 2408 (2018), it does not authorize a President to override congressional policy judgments. The Proclamation therefore exceeds the Presiden......
  • April Grant Alerts: Supreme Court To Hear Challenge On Scope Of Nationwide Injunctions In Birthright Citizenship Case
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • May 1, 2025
    ..."emerg[ed] for the first time in the 1960s and dramatically increas[ed] in popularity only very recently."Trump v. Hawaii, 138 S. Ct. 2392 (2018) (Thomas, J., concurring). And although remaining exceedingly rare in the few decades that followed, nationwide injunctions slowly crept up to an ......
  • Nationwide Freeze Issued Preventing Federal Government From Enforcing COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate For Federal Contractors
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • December 13, 2021
    ...ever, unless and until they are upheld when they 'percolate through the federal court system.' Georgia v. Biden (quoting Trump v. Hawaii, 138 S.Ct. 2392, 2424 (2018) (Thomas, J., concurring). What Should Employers Do Now? It may take some time for the courts to resolve issues relating to th......
  • Get Started for Free
174 books & journal articles
  • Citing Slavery.
    • United States
    • Stanford Law Review Vol. 72 No. 1, January 2020
    • January 1, 2020
    ...precedent," a process where judges consider historical evidence to evaluate the precedential value of cases). (181.) Trump v. Hawaii, 138 S. Ct. 2392, 2423 (2018) (condemning Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944)). (182.) Id. (183.) See Jamal Greene, The Anticanon, 125 Har v.L. Re......
  • PROCEDURAL LOSSES AND THE PYRRHIC VICTORY OF ABOLISHING QUALIFIED IMMUNITY.
    • United States
    • Washington University Law Review Vol. 99 No. 5, June 2022
    • June 1, 2022
    ...nevertheless altering the standard in such a way that it largely obliterates the substantive rights Roe protects. Cf. Trump v. Hawaii, 138 S. Ct. 2392, 2447-48 (2018) (Sotomayor, J., dissenting) (noting that the majority formally repudiated Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944), w......
  • Equity's Constitutional Source.
    • United States
    • Yale Law Journal Vol. 132 No. 5, March 2023
    • March 1, 2023
    ...on these terms, see infra Part I. (21.) See DHS v. New York, 140 S. Ct. 599, 600 (2020) (Gorsuch, J., concurring); Trump v. Hawaii, 138 S. Ct. 2392, 2425-26 (2018) (Thomas, J., concurring); Amy Coney Barrett, Assoc. Just., U.S. Sup. Ct., The Nature of Federal Equity Power, Keynote Address a......
  • Limiting NIFLA.
    • United States
    • Stanford Law Review Vol. 72 No. 1, January 2020
    • January 1, 2020
    ...note 24, at 134-35 (describing a trend of corporations using the First Amendment as a deregulatory tool). (206.) Compare Trump v. Hawaii, 138 S. Ct. 2392, 2423 (2018) (expressing "no view on the soundness of challenged executive orders issued by the Trump Administration), with Editorial, Wh......
  • Get Started for Free