Trustees Dir. Guild Am.-Producer Pension v. Tise, AMERICA-PRODUCER

Decision Date06 December 2000
Docket Number96-16994,AMERICA-PRODUCER,Nos. 96-16799,TISE-MYERS,s. 96-16799
Citation234 F.3d 415
Parties(9th Cir. 2000) TRUSTEES OF THE DIRECTORS GUILD OFPENSION BENEFITS PLANS, a collectively bargained, joint-trusteed labor-management trust, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SUZANNE R. TISE, an individual, Defendant-Appellee, CYBELE, an individual; CHLOE, an individual, Defendants, and YVONNE CURRY, an individual, Defendant-Appellant. TRUSTEES OF THE DIRECTORS GUILD OFPENSION BENEFITS PLANS, a collectively bargained, joint-trusteed labor-management trust, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUZANNE R. TISE, an individual, Defendant-Appellee, CYBELE, an individual; CHLOE, an individual, Defendants, and YVONNE CURRY, an individual, Defendant-Appellee
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
NOTE: SEE AMENDED OPINION AT 255 F.3D 661

To continue reading

Request your trial
176 cases
  • Defazio v. Hollister Employee Share Ownership
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • 23 Febrero 2005
    ...state-law-created interest in an ERISA plan is enforced under ERISA's QDRO provisions." Trustees of Directors Guild of America-Producer Pension Benefits Plans v. Tise, 234 F.3d 415, 420 (9th Cir. 2000). "Whether a state court's order meets the statutory requirements to be a QDRO, and theref......
  • Stahl v. Exxon Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Texas
    • 1 Julio 2002
    ... ... ("Exxon"), and Defendant ExxonMobil Pension Plan's, formerly known as Exxon Annuity Plan ... Julian v. Trustees of the Agreement of Trust for Maritime Ass'n — ... See Trustees of Dirs. Guild of America-Producer ... Page 671 ... Pension Benefits Plans v. Tise, 234 F.3d 415, 426 (9th Cir.2000); Patton v ... ...
  • Griffin v. Griffin
    • United States
    • Virginia Court of Appeals
    • 28 Enero 2014
    ...only to ERISA's rule against assignment of plan benefits but also to ERISA's broad preemption of state law.” Trs. of the Dirs. Guild v. Tise, 234 F.3d 415, 420 (9th Cir.2000) (citing 29 U.S.C. § 1144(b)(7)). 29 U.S.C. § 1056(d)(3)(A) provides, Paragraph (1) [stating benefits may not be assi......
  • Carmona v. Carmona
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 17 Septiembre 2008
    ...ability of state courts to create enforceable property interests in alternate payees. See Trs. of the Dirs. Guild of Am.-Producer Pension Benefits Plans v. Tise, 234 F.3d 415, 420 (9th Cir. 2000). First, in order for a DRO to be considered a QDRO, the state courts must fulfill certain speci......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT