Tuchman v. State

Decision Date20 September 2005
Citation275 Conn. 920,883 A.2d 1252
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court
PartiesNorman TUCHMAN et al. v. STATE of Connecticut et al.

Kenneth A. Votre, New Haven, in support of the petition.

David H. Wrinn, assistant attorney general, in opposition.

The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 89 Conn.App. 745, 878 A.2d 384(2005), is denied.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
2 cases
  • West v. New Haven Housing Authority, No. CV-04-4002185 S (Conn. Super. 5/23/2006)
    • United States
    • Connecticut Superior Court
    • May 23, 2006
    ... ... 1 During this time, the defendant was acting under color of law, i.e., under color of the state constitution and statutes and city laws and regulations. The defendant's conduct deprived the plaintiffs of their rights to equal protection in ...         The court reached a similar conclusion in Tuchman v. State, 89 Conn.App. 745, 878 A.2d 384, cert. denied, 883 A.2d 1252 (2005). In that case, the plaintiffs "summarily stated that they were treated ... ...
  • Czeczotka v. State, No. CV 05 4002599 (Conn. Super. 5/30/2006), CV 05 4002599
    • United States
    • Connecticut Superior Court
    • May 30, 2006
    ... ... the doctrine of sovereign immunity bars that portion of their claims, and they [are] properly dismissed by the trial court." Tuchman v. State, 89 Conn.App. 745, 753, 878 A.2d 384, cert. denied, 275 Coun. 920, 883 A.2d 1252 (2005) ... Conclusion ...         For the foregoing reasons, the court hereby grants Trooper Keri Perez's motion to dismiss the third and fourth counts of the plaintiff's complaint ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT