Tunnicliffe v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 8259.
| Decision Date | 09 March 1937 |
| Docket Number | No. 8259.,8259. |
| Citation | 88 F.2d 873 |
| Parties | William H. TUNNICLIFFE, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
H. M. Voorhis, of Orlando, Fla., for petitioner.
Howard P. Locke, J. Louis Monarch, and Sewall Key, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., Robert H. Jackson and James W. Morris, Asst. Attys. Gen., and Herman Oliphant, Gen. Counsel, Dept. of Treasury, and John E. Marshall, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Before FOSTER, SIBLEY, and HUTCHESON, Circuit Judges.
This petition for review involves similar facts and the same questions dealt with in the opinion this day filed in John H. Therrell v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (C.C.A.) 88 F.(2d) 869. For the reasons stated in that opinion the judgment is reversed, with direction to eliminate the contested tax.
Reversed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Helvering v. Therrell
...as required by her statutes? The opinions below, Therrell v. Com'r of Internal Revenue, 5 Cir., 88 F.2d 869; Tunnicliffe v. Com'r of Internal Revenue, 5 Cir., 88 F.2d 873; McLoughlin v. Com'r of Internal Revenue, 2 Cir., 89 F.2d 699; Freedman v. Com'r of Internal Revenue, 3 Cir., 92 F.2d 15......
- Therrell v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue