Tunstill v. State, 8 Div. 430.
| Citation | 34 So.2d 859,250 Ala. 421 |
| Decision Date | 15 April 1948 |
| Docket Number | 8 Div. 430. |
| Parties | Louis TUNSTILL v. STATE. |
| Court | Supreme Court of Alabama |
Certiorari to Court of Appeals.
A. A. Carmichael, Atty. Gen., and L. E. Barton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the petition.
Grady J. Long, of Hartselle, opposed.
Petition of the State, by its Attorney General, for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in the case of Tunstill v. State, 34 So.2d 857.
Writ denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Clements v. State, 7 Div. 575
...316 So.2d 716; Tarver v. State, 53 Ala.App. 661, 303 So.2d 161; Tunstill v. State, 33 Ala.App. 460, 34 So.2d 857, cert. denied, 250 Ala. 421, 34 So.2d 859. A demand for personal property is not a required element of proof in order to make out a Prima facie case of robbery. There was suffici......
-
Mallory v. State, 6 Div. 831
...Harwood, then Harwood, P.J., of the former Court of Appeals, in Tunstill v. State, 33 Ala.App. 460, 34 So.2d 857, cert. denied 250 Ala. 421, 34 So.2d 859, '. . . Thomas v. State, 91 Ala. 34, 9 So. 81, 82, contains an excellent discussion by Justice McClellan of the offense of robbery. There......
-
Dixon v. State
...employed. We do not agree. This Court, through Judge Harwood, in Tunstill v. State, 33 Ala.App. 460, 34 So.2d 857, cert. denied 250 Ala. 421, 34 So.2d 859; and through Judge Harris, in Tarver v. State, 53 Ala.App. 661, 303 So.2d 161, fully set forth the essential elements of the offense of ......
-
Beverly v. State
...the act by which possession of the property is acquired. Tunstill v. State, 33 Ala.App. 460, 463, 34 So.2d 857, cert. denied, 250 Ala. 421, 34 So.2d 859 (1948). Here, the State failed to prove that Deroo was deprived of his backpack by force or fear as charged in the The issue presented was......