Turner v. Crime Detective
Citation | 34 F. Supp. 8 |
Decision Date | 01 August 1940 |
Docket Number | No. 335.,335. |
Parties | TURNER et al. v. CRIME DETECTIVE et al. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Oklahoma |
George W. Reed, Jr., of Tulsa, Okl., for plaintiffs.
C. H. Rosenstein, of Tulsa, Okl., for defendant.
This action was instituted by the surviving relatives of Leonard Turner, deceased, for the recovery of damages for an alleged libel published and circulated by the defendants, concerning the deceased, but after his death. The only defendant upon whom process has been served has interposed its motion to dismiss.
The only question presented is whether one who falsely, and without a privilege so to do, publishes libelous matter of a deceased person, is liable to the estate of said person or to his relatives.
At common law, a cause of action for libel did not survive the deceased, and neither was there liability to the estate of said person nor to his relatives. See Restatement of the Law of Torts, Vol. 3, Sec. 560; Corpus Juris vol. 37, Sec. 295; Skrocki v. Stahl, 14 Cal.App. 1, 110 P. 957; Bradt v. New Nonpareil Co., 108 Iowa 449, 79 N.W. 122, 45 L.R.A. 681.
Unless an Oklahoma Statute provides for liability in such a case, there can be no action for the recovery of damages for libeling a deceased person.
Several provisions are contained in the Oklahoma Statutes concerning libel. A consideration of the various provisions is necessary to determine the questions presented. At the outset, Sec. 1052 Title 12, Okl.St.Ann. provides as follows: "No action pending in any court shall abate by the death of either or both the parties thereto, except an action for libel, slander, malicious prosecution, for a nuisance, or against a justice of the peace for misconduct in office, which shall abate by the death of the defendant."
The above provision was considered by the Oklahoma Supreme Court in Alles v. Interstate Power Co., 176 Okl. 252, 253, 55 P.2d 751, in which it was held that a motion to dismiss was properly sustained when the plaintiff dies, even while an appeal was pending to the Supreme Court taken by the plaintiff below after a demurrer was sustained and the cause dismissed. The facts involved in the cited case differ from those here presented, in that the action had been started during the life time of the deceased, while here the alleged libel was committed after the death of the deceased.
Sec. 1444, Title 12, Okl.St.Ann., is as follows:
The above provision refers to the defamatory matter being published or spoken of the plaintiff, and provides for a recovery by the plaintiff. No mention is made of relatives or an estate. No reason is advanced for a loose construction of the above Statute; consequently, such Statute was strictly construed, and as so construed provides for a recovery by a plaintiff who has been defamed.
Two statutory provisions tend to establish the right of relatives to recover damages for defaming or scandalizing a deceased. They are Section...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Insull v. New York World-Telegram Corporation, 58 C 108
...Billingsley v. Townsend, 132 Ohio St. 603, 9 N.E.2d 690; Alles v. Interstate Power Co., 176 Okl. 252, 55 P.2d 751; Turner v. Crime Detective, D.C.N.D.Okl., 34 F.Supp. 8; Palmisano v. News Syndicate Co., D.C. S.D.N.Y., 130 F.Supp. 17. Plaintiff's contention is that because of the defamation ......
-
Hughes v. New England Newspaper Pub. Co.
...live by the disclosure that they were related to the deceased. Security Sales Agency v. A. S. Abell Co., D.C., 205 F. 941;Turner v. Crime Detective, D.C., 34 F.Supp. 8;Skrocki v. Stahl, 14 Cal.App. 1, 110 P. 957;Saucer v. Giroux, 54 Cal.App. 732, 202 P. 887;Hurst v. Goodwin, 114 Ga. 585,40 ......
-
Lee v. Weston
...Inc., 284 N.Y. 335, 31 N.E.2d 182, 132 A.L.R. 888; Sorenson v. Balaban, 11 App.Div. 164, 42 N.Y.S. 654, 656-657; Turner v. Crime Detective, D.C.N.D.Okl., 34 F.Supp. 8; Renfro Drug Co. v. Lawson, 138 Tex. 434, 160 S.W.2d 246, 249-250, 146 A.L.R. 732. See, also, 3 Restatement, Torts, § 560; 1......
-
Drake v. Park Newspapers of Northeastern Oklahoma, Inc., 59336
...criminal offense, has never given rise to a cause of action in favor of relatives who were not personally defamed. In Turner v. Crime Detective, 34 F.Supp. 8 (N.D.Okl.1940), the court held that 12 O.S. § 1441 did not create a cause of action in favor of a defamed decedent's relatives. See a......