Turner v. Haynes, 71-2004

Decision Date15 October 1973
Docket NumberNo. 71-2004,72-1169.,71-2004
Citation485 F.2d 183
PartiesRobert H. TURNER, Jr., Appellant, v. Lloyd E. HAYNES, Warden of the Huttonsville Correctional Center, Appellee. Tony W. SITES, Appellant, v. Lloyd E. HAYNES, Warden of the Huttonsville Correctional Center, Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit

Manton M. Grier, Columbia, S. C. Court-appointed counsel (Boyd, Knowlton, Tate & Finlay, Columbia, S. C., on brief), for appellants.

Richard E. Hardison, Deputy Atty. Gen. of W. Va. (Chauncey H. Browning, Jr., Atty. Gen. of W. Va., E. Leslie Hoffman, III, Asst. Atty. Gen. of W. Va., David P. Cleek, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen. of W. Va., on brief), for appellee.

Before CRAVEN, BUTZNER and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

State prisoners Robert Turner and Tony Sites appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virgina denying their petitions for writs of habeas corpus. These codefendants claim that the state trial court, in accepting their guilty pleas, failed to build an adequate record to show that the pleas were voluntarily entered — i. e., that they knew the specific crime to which they pleaded guilty and the maximum sentence they might receive. We consolidated the two cases for purposes of this appeal.

Appellants were jointly indicted for three separate offenses: burglary in the nighttime, burglary in the daytime, and grand larceny. Nighttime burglary is punishable by imprisonment for an indeterminate term of 1-15 years, while daytime burglary and grand larceny are punishable by 1-10 year sentences. In June 1970, Turner and Sites entered pleas of not guilty to all three charges. On September 29, 1970, they changed their pleas to guilty on the charge of burglary in the nighttime, and the other two charges apparently were dismissed.

After exhausting state post-conviction remedies, both men filed habeas petitions in federal district court. After considering the petitions and the respondent's answers, the district judge convened a joint plenary hearing. In Turner's case, the record shows that in open court Turner pleaded guilty to an indictment "involving the dwelling-house of one Luke Crossland, wherein various items were alleged to have been taken." It was thus apparent that Turner knew to which indictment he was pleading. The evidence at the plenary hearing indicates that Turner met with his attorney approximately six times, and that his attorney had...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Lee Const. Co. v. Fed. Reserve Bank of Richmond
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Maryland
    • August 6, 1982
  • Motor Coach Industries, Inc. v. Dole
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • January 26, 1984
  • Adams v. State, 60499
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • August 30, 1978
    ...v. Henderson, 482 F.2d 1101, 1109 (5th Cir. 1973); Walker v. Caldwell, 476 F.2d 213-15, 16, n.1 (5th Cir. 1973); Turner v. Haynes, 485 F.2d 183, 184 (4th Cir. 1973); Mountjoy v. Swensen, 306 F.Supp. 379, 384-85 (W.D.Mo.1969); State v. Elliott, 192 Neb. 217, 219 N.W.2d 775, 776 (1974); State......
  • Todd v. Lockhart, 73-1501.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • January 16, 1974
    ...v. Caldwell, 476 F.2d 213, 215-216 n.1 (5th Cir. 1973), cure the otherwise defective plea-taking transcript. See also Turner v. Haynes, 485 F.2d 183, 184 (4th Cir. 1973); Mountjoy v. Swenson, 306 F.Supp. 379, 384-385 (W.D. Mo.1969); State v. Darling, 109 Ariz. 148, 506 P.2d 1042, 1046 (1973......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT