Turner v. Mull

Docket Number14-1589
Decision Date28 April 2015

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
69 cases
  • Aery v. Nohre
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Minnesota
    • August 23, 2023
    ...but must substantiate allegations with sufficient probative evidence that would permit a finding in his favor." Turner v. Mull, 784 F.3d 485, 489 (8th Cir. 2015) (quotation omitted); see also Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986) ("[A] par......
  • Clayton v. Dejoy
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Missouri
    • November 20, 2020
    ...a protected activity; (2) suffered an adverse employment action; and (3) there is a causal connection between the two. Turner v. Mull, 784 F.3d 485, 493 (8th Cir. 2015).14 EEO complaints are recognized as protected activity under the Rehabilitation Act. Sherman v. Runyon, 235 F.3d 406, 410 ......
  • Burke v. Glass
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Missouri
    • September 12, 2017
    ...to establish that Rucker threatened him as a matter of law. See Turner v. Mull, 997 F. Supp. 2d 985, 996 (E.D. Mo. 2014), aff'd, 784 F.3d 485 (8th Cir. 2015) ("Plaintiff's conclusory allegations that Thebeau ordered the cell search and the search was prompted by Thebeau's retaliatory intent......
  • Rader v. Ally Fin., Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Minnesota
    • January 30, 2020
    ...but must substantiate allegations with sufficient probative evidence that would permit a finding in his favor." Turner v. Mull, 784 F.3d 485, 489 (8th Cir. 2015) (quotation omitted). Plaintiff states that his motion is "based upon the premise that [Defendant] has no valid assignment or auth......
  • Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
  • F. Your Right to Be Free from Cruel and Unusual Punishment
    • United States
    • The Jailhouse Lawyer's Handbook (CCR) Chapter Three
    • Invalid date
    ...v. Terry, 38 F. App'x 363, 364-65 (9th Cir. 2002) ("verbal threats do not constitute cruel and unusual punishment."); Turner v. Mull, 784 F.3d 485, 492 (8th Cir. 2015) (threatening to drown plaintiff without taking further action was not unconstitutional). But in Lisle v. Welborn, 933 F.3d ......
  • Part Two: case summaries by major topic.
    • United States
    • Detention and Corrections Caselaw Quarterly No. 65, November 2015
    • November 1, 2015
    ...in avoiding confinement on death row. (Sussex I State Prison, Virginia) U.S. Appeals Court SANITATION MEDICAL CARE Turner v. Mull, 784 F.3d 485 (8th Cir. 2015). A state inmate filed a [section] 1983 action alleging that correctional officials violated his rights under the Eighth Amendment, ......
  • Part Two: case summaries by major topic.
    • United States
    • Detention and Corrections Caselaw Quarterly No. 65, November 2015
    • November 1, 2015
    ...for prohibiting multicolored headbands. (Wisconsin Department of Corrections) U.S. Appeals Court WHEELCHAIR TRANSPORTATION Turner v. Mull, 784 F.3d 485 (8111 Cir. 2015). A state inmate filed a [section] 1983 action alleging that correctional officials violated his rights under the Eighth Am......
  • Part One: complete case summaries in alphabetical order.
    • United States
    • Detention and Corrections Caselaw Quarterly No. 65, November 2015
    • November 1, 2015
    ...Act, Wheelchair SAFETY AND SECURITY: Wheelchair, Transportation SANITATION: Housekeeping TRANSFERS: Transportation Turner v. Mull, 784 F.3d 485 (8th Cir. 2015). A state inmate filed a [section] 1983 action alleging that correctional officials violated his rights under the Eighth Amendment, ......