Turner v. United States, No. 12–5168.
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
| Citation | 568 U.S. 898,184 L.Ed.2d 178,133 S.Ct. 302 (Mem) |
| Docket Number | No. 12–5168. |
| Parties | Antonio TURNER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES. |
| Decision Date | 01 October 2012 |
568 U.S. 898
133 S.Ct. 302 (Mem)
184 L.Ed.2d 178
Antonio TURNER, petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 12–5168.
Supreme Court of the United States
Oct. 1, 2012.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
7 cases
-
United States v. Thompson, 12–31203.
...[is] able to consider the demeanor of the prosecutor.” United States v. Turner, 674 F.3d 420, 436 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,––– U.S. ––––, 133 S.Ct. 302, 184 L.Ed.2d 178 (2012).10 We review the government's proffered race-neutral explanation as a legal issue de novo. United States v. William......
-
United States v. Pratt, 11–31049.
...of counsel's explanation.’ ” (quoting United States v. Perkins, 105 F.3d 976, 978 (5th Cir.1997))), cert. denied,––– U.S. ––––, 133 S.Ct. 302, 184 L.Ed.2d 178 (2012). 42.Snyder v. Louisiana, 552 U.S. 472, 477, 128 S.Ct. 1203, 170 L.Ed.2d 175 (2008) (quoting Hernandez, 500 U.S. at 366, 111 S......
-
United States v. Thompson, 12-31203
...provide, and [is] able to consider the demeanor of the prosecutor." United States v. Turner, 674 F.3d 420, 436 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 133 S. Ct. 302 (2012).10 We review the government's proffered race-neutral explanation as a legal issue de novo. United States v. Williams, 264 F.3d 561, ......
-
United States v. Selgas, CRIM. ACTION NO. 3:18-CR-0356-S
...Defendants from this comment did notPage 15 affect the outcome.7 See United States v. Turner, 674 F.3d 420, 439 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 568 U.S. 898 (2012).(4) Acquittal of Michelle Selgas Green contends that he is entitled to a new trial because the Court instructed the jury that "[t]he ......
Request a trial to view additional results