Turney v. Southern P. Co.

Decision Date01 February 1904
Citation44 Or. 280,75 P. 144
PartiesTURNEY v. SOUTHERN PAC. CO.
CourtOregon Supreme Court

Appeal from Circuit Court, Clackamas County; Thomas A. McBride Judge.

Action by Rebecca Turney against the Southern Pacific Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

This is an action to recover damages for an injury suffered by the plaintiff through the alleged negligence of the defendant. In 1868 a public road or highway, about 60 feet wide, from Canemah, in Clackamas county, south to Parrott's Farm was inclosed by fences of abutting property owners on one side, and the Willamette river on the other. In November 1868, the county court, upon the application of defendant's predecessor in interest for permission to occupy the road with its railway track, made the following order:

"In the Matter of the Occupation of the County Road by O.C.R.R Co. of Salem, Leading from Canemah to Parrott's Farm in Clackamas County. On this day came said company, by Geo. E. Cole and the county by Johnson & McCower, and, after hearing the argument of counsel, it was ordered by the court that the Oregon Central Railroad Company of Salem be allowed to use and occupy any part of the road leading from Canemah to Parrott's Farm, in Clackamas county, for a railroad track or bed, said company repairing all damages wherever it occurs in constructing said railroad, and in no manner whatever obstructing said road; that the road shall be in all respects left in as good a condition as before said company began work. Said company also to make, construct, and grade (wherever the said company occupy the tract now traveled as a county road) a good and passable track or roadway at least twelve feet wide, on a grade to be designated by the court, upon a notice having first been given by said company to this court at a regular term thereof. Said company shall also construct barriers or guards at and in all places that may hereafter be designated by this court, and if the county road shall at any time be injured or damaged by reason of the proximity of the railroad track, or by any act of said company, then said company shall be compelled to repair the same, without delay, upon notice being given by the road supervisor of the district in which said road may be located."

When it came to the actual construction of the railway along the county road, the company wished to have the grade of the road established, and upon its application another order in reference thereto was made and entered by the county court as follows:

"In the Matter of the Application of the Oregon Central Railroad Company of Salem for the Use of the County Road from Canemah to Parrott's Farm. This matter came before the court upon the representation of Hon. Geo. E. Cole, agent of said company, that it was desirable to have an order of this court fixing the grade of such public road at points where the present traveled track is taken for the track or roadway of said company. Whereupon the court, by the favor of said company's agent, proceeded to make a personal inspection of said road and the work which had been done. And by such examination it was found that neither the spirit nor letter of the order heretofore made by this court in granting the right of way to said company is being complied with, but that, on the contrary, said company, in constructing said roadway or bed, are confining the travel on the county road at places between Canemah and Parrott's Farm to the river bank, and in some instances to the water's edge, by building perpendicular embankments of stone, and leaving said embankments and the county road between them and the river without any protection against high water, or, if any protection is attempted, it is entirely inadequate for the purpose, and does not make the road as secure or convenient as before the company commenced work. Said company is therefore referred to the order heretofore made by this court, as above mentioned, as a basis or guide in controlling their doings in reference to said road, and the condition in which said county road must be left after being by them in any manner interfered with in constructing said railroad. This court readopts the same order as the basis of its action in making the following additional order, to wit: That said company, in confining the travel on said county road to the bank of the river in narrower limits than the sixty feet allowed by law to public roads, creates a necessity for a rockwall protection, and that, when they desire to put in such walls at a greater angle than 45 degrees, they must build such stone walls of very large or heavy material, and, when the angle is 45 degrees or less, the stone must be at least one foot in diameter, and in all cases the openings or interstices in such walls must be well filled with spalls or stone chips as in ordinary stone wall made in constructing their roadbed. It is further ordered that in any case where said company changed the travelway of the county road, or remove or change any bridge or filling on said county road, said new roadway, bridge, or filling shall be graded as high, and made as good, convenient, and secure in all respects, as the traveled way before said road was interfered with. And it is ordered that during the progress of said work said company must keep the travelway on said road open, safe, and convenient for the use of the public, and when work is suspended for winter said road must be left in good condition, and not unsafe or mirey, as in many places during the winter just passed."

In pursuance of these orders the track of the railway company was laid along the county road on the east side near the fences of the abutting property owners, and, as a consequence, the travel was confined to the space between the track and the river, thereby endangering the safety of teams and stock passing along the highway. In 1877 the railroad petitioned the county court for permission to change the location of its road, and after due consideration the following order in reference thereto was made and entered:

"It is further considered, ordered, and adjudged that the said Oregon & California Railroad Company have leave to, and it is hereby authorized to, change the location of its railroad track, and the right of way now in use over the county road between Canemah and Parrott creek, as at present located, from a point near the county road crossing at F. Paquet's property, south of Canemah, for the distance of (5,100) five thousand one hundred feet in a southerly direction, as follows: That is to say, said Oregon & California Railroad Company have leave to, and is hereby authorized to, relocate its said road a distance of fourteen (14) feet nearer the river from railroad crossing at Paquet's property, and running from said point fourteen feet northwesterly from said crossing in a southerly direction, and parallel with the line of the railroad as at present located a distance of five thousand one hundred feet, so that the road, when relocated, shall be, except where it deflects to a connection with the road as now constructed, fourteen (14) feet nearer the river than the present location. Said company, however, shall fill up so much of the holes between said track and the fences as will fall within a twelve-foot roadway, and cause the same to be made level, and also construct a fence or barrier between the traveled roadway and the railroad track for said distance of five thousand one hundred feet, and place the cattle guard upon its road at each end of said fence, provided, if at any time said railroad company is prevented by legal proceedings by property owners adjacent thereto, or otherwise, from building or maintaining said fence, said company shall thenceforward be absolved from the obligations to construct or maintain the same, as the case may be, so far as thus prevented, all at its own expense.

"It is further considered and adjudged that said Oregon & California Railroad Company be, and it is hereby, relieved and exonerated from making any repair, building any barriers, stone walls, or otherwise, along said road, except so far as said company may deem necessary for its own protection.

"It is further ordered that the contract entered into between this county and said Oregon California Railroad Company, of date August 3d, 1869, entered of record on page 344 of Book No. 2 [3] of the records of this court, be modified to the extent and in the manner herein specified, and that, except as hereby changed and modified, said contract be and remain in full force and effect, and when said changes are made the same be examined and approved by the county court."

In accordance with this order the railway company moved its track, constructed a fence between the same and the traveled way east thereof, making a lane or road about 25 feet wide and put in the cattle guards as required, ever since which time all the travel on the highway, except foot passengers and bicyclists, has been confined to the part of the road east of the fence built by the railway company, and between it and the fences of the abutting property owners. Pedestrians and bicyclists, however, have continued to use the portion of the highway inclosed by the railway company without objection or protest from it; and at the time of the injury to the plaintiff there was a well-beaten and plainly marked footpath a short distance west of the railroad track, and between it and the river. On September 13, 1900, the plaintiff, who lives on the county road, about a mile south of Canemah, while going from her home to Canemah along the footpath, saw a freight train of the defendant company approaching, and stepped off the path toward the river; and, while the train was passing her, a stick of wood was...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Dight v. Chapman
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • February 1, 1904
  • Turney v. Southern P. Co.
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • June 13, 1904
    ...280 TURNEY v. SOUTHERN PAC. CO. Supreme Court of OregonJune 13, 1904 On petition for rehearing. Petition denied. For former opinion, see 75 P. 144. PER Notwithstanding the able and forceful argument in the petition for rehearing, a re-examination of the chief and controlling point in this c......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT