Turnknett v. Keaton
| Citation | 266 F.2d 572 |
| Decision Date | 23 April 1959 |
| Docket Number | No. 17535.,17535. |
| Parties | H. H. TURNKNETT, suing as next friend for his minor daughter, Tresa Lynn Turknett, Appellant, v. H. G. KEATON and Grady Acuff, d/b/a Three League Gin Company of Lamesa, Texas, Appellees. |
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit) |
Thomas A. Sneed, John J. Watts, Odessa, Tex., for appellant.
Jack Little, James Little, Elton Gilliland, Big Spring, Tex., Little & Gilliland, Big Spring, Tex., of counsel, for appellees.
Before TUTTLE, CAMERON and WISDOM, Circuit Judges.
This appeal presents the single question whether the trial court correctly held that no cause of action arises under Texas law for injuries to an unborn child.
Appellant concedes that the only Texas decisions, Magnolia Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. Jordan, 124 Tex. 347, 78 S.W.2d 944, 97 A.L.R. 1513, and Lewis v. Steves Sash & Door Company, Tex. Civ.App., 177 S.W.2d 350 (writ refused), have held that no such cause of action arises. Contending that the trend of modern decisions in other jurisdictions is towards a more liberal rule, appellant asks us to hold that the Texas Court would today adopt a different rule. Under the principle of Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. 1188, we cannot do this. In a diversity case we are bound to apply to local law on substantive matters. See Polk County, Ga. v. Lincoln Nat. Life Insurance Society, 5 Cir., 262 F.2d 486.
The judgment is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Karl Rove & Co. v. Thornburgh
...the forum state ... and when the state court has spoken ... clearly ... we are bound to follow that ruling."); Turknett v. Keaton, 266 F.2d 572, 572 (5th Cir.1959) (per curiam) (stating that in diversity case, federal courts cannot alter settled law of forum state regardless of modern trend......
-
Leal v. C. C. Pitts Sand & Gravel, Inc.
...after its birth. See also, Lewis v. Steves Sash & Door Co., Tex.Civ.App., 177 S.W.2d 350 (1943, writ ref'd); Turnknett v. Keaton and Acuff, Ct. of App., 5th Cir., 266 F.2d 572. Appellants urge, however, that this rule should now be reviewed in view of the overwhelming trend of the cases all......
-
Wendt v. Lillo
...Mass. 461, 95 N.E.2d 206; Cavanaugh v. First National Stores, Inc., 1952, 329 Mass. 179, 107 N.E.2d 307. In the case of Turnknett v. Keaton, 5 Cir., 1959, 266 F.2d 572, jurisdiction was based upon diversity of citizenship and Texas law was applicable. Recovery was sought for injuries to an ......
-
Foley & Lardner, L.L.P. v. Aldar Investments, Inc.
...to apply state law on substantive matters. Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. 1188 (1938); Turknett v. Keaton, 266 F.2d 572 (5th Cir.1959). A. Foley's Legal Malpractice Claim Against In Louisiana, a client suing his or her attorney for legal malpractice must prove ......