Twentieth Century Fox Film v. Cablevision Sys.

Decision Date22 March 2007
Docket NumberNo. 06 Civ. 4092(DC).,No. 06 Civ. 3990(DC).,06 Civ. 3990(DC).,06 Civ. 4092(DC).
Citation478 F.Supp.2d 607
PartiesTWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION et al., Plaintiffs, v. CABLEVISION SYSTEMS CORPORATION et ano, Defendants. The Cartoon Network LP, LLLP, et ano, Plaintiffs, v. CSC Holdings, Inc. et ano, Defendants, etc.
CourtU.S. District Court — Southern District of New York

Arnold & Porter, by Robert Alan Garrett, Esq., Hadrian R. Katz, Esq., Washington, D.C., and by Peter L. Zimroth, Esq., Eleanor M. Lackman, Esq., New York, NY, and Simon Barsky, Esq., Gregory P. Goeckner, Esq., Encino, CA, for Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation et al.

Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, by Katherine B. Forrest, Esq., Antony L. Ryan, Esq., Chelsea Teachout, Esq., New York, NY, for The Cartoon Network LP, LLLP and Cable News Network LP, LLLP.

Goodwin Procter LLP, by John C. Englander, Esq., J. Anthony Downs, Esq., R David Hosp, Esq., Timothy A. Macht, Esq., Robert D. Carroll, Esq., Boston, MA, and by Benjamin Hershkowitz, Esq., New York, NY, for Cablevision Systems Corporation, Inc. and CSC Holdings, Inc.

OPINION

CHIN, District Judge.

In March 2006, Cablevision Systems Corporation ("Cablevision") announced that it would be rolling out a "new Remote-Storage DVR System" (the "RS-DVR"). The RS-DVR is intended for Cablevision customers who do not have a digital video recorder ("DVR") in their homes. The RS-DVR would permit these customers to record programs on central servers at Cablevision's facilities and play the programs back for viewing at home.

Cablevision has not obtained permission from plaintiffs, the owners of the copyrighted programs, to reproduce and transmit the programs through its proposed RS-DVR. It contends that a license is not required because the customer, not Cablevision, chooses the content and records the programs for personal viewing. It argues that, under Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417, 104 S.Ct. 774, 78 L.Ed.2d 574 (1984), a company cannot be liable for infringement merely because it supplies Betamax recorders, video cassette recorders ("VCRs"), or DVRs to consumers to record television programs for in-home, personal viewing, and it further contends that its RS-DVR is no different from these traditional devices.

In these related cases, plaintiffs sue Cablevision and its parent, CSC Holdings, Inc. ("CSC"), for copyright infringement, seeking a declaratory judgment that Cablevision's RS-DVR would violate their copyrights and an injunction enjoining defendants from rolling out the RS-DVR without copyright licenses. Defendants counterclaim for a declaratory judgment holding that the RS-DVR would not infringe on plaintiffs' copyrights. The parties' cross-motions for summary judgment are before the Court.

Plaintiffs' motions are granted and defendants' motion is denied, for I conclude that Cablevision, and not just its customers, would be engaging in unauthorized reproductions and transmissions of plaintiffs' copyrighted programs under the RS-DVR. Indeed, the RS-DVR is not a stand-alone machine that sits on top of a television. Rather, it is a complex system that involves an ongoing relationship between Cablevision and its customers, payment of monthly fees by the customers to Cablevision, ownership of the equipment remaining with Cablevision, the use of numerous computers and other equipment located in Cablevision's private facilities, and the ongoing maintenance of the system by Cablevision personnel. Accordingly, judgment will be entered in favor of plaintiffs.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE
A. The Facts

As the parties agree, the facts are largely undisputed. (Tr. 9, 194).1

1. The Parties

Plaintiffs, counterclaim-defendants, and third-party defendants are The Cartoon Network LP, LLLP; Cable News Network LP, LLLP; Turner Broadcasting System, Inc.; Turner Network Sales, Inc.; Turner Classic Movies, L.P., LLLP; Turner Network Television LP, LLLP; Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation; Universal City Studios Productions LLLP, Paramount Pictures Corporation; Disney ,Enterprises, Inc.; CBS Broadcasting Companies, Inc.; and NBC Studios, Inc. (collectively, "plaintiffs"). Plaintiffs own the copyrights to numerous copyrighted entertainment programs, including movies, television series, news and sports shows, and cartoons, which are shown on television and also used (or licensed for use) in other media, including the Internet, DVDs, and cellular phone technology. Defendants, counter-claim plaintiffs, and third-party plaintiffs are Cablevision and CSC ("defendants"). They own and operate cable television systems, primarily in the New York City metropolitan area. Cablevision provides its customers with a wide variety of programs, including programs owned by plaintiffs, pursuant to negotiated and statutory (i.e., required by law) licenses or "affiliation agreements." (See, e.g., Turner Exs. 25, 26).

None of the licenses between plaintiffs and Cablevision authorizes Cablevision to transmit or reproduce plaintiffs' copyrighted programming through the RS-DVR. (Tr. 199-201).

2.Cable Television

Television involves the transmission of audio and video signals—"a moving picture, plus sound." (Horowitz Report ¶ 16). "Broadcast television" is transmitted over public airwaves and can be received with only a television set and an antenna. (Id. ¶ 30). "Cable television" is transmitted via a coaxial cable that is connected to a television set, usually through a "set-top box" provided by a cable company. (Id. ¶ 31). Cable companies offer customers, for a fee, a number of programming channels, including basic cable (e.g., TNT and Disney Channel) and premium cable (e.g., HBO and Showtime) channels. (Id. ¶ 32 Fox Statement of Facts ("Fox SOF") ¶¶ 2-4). Basic and premium cable channels, along with broadcast television stations, are linear channels, meaning that they televise programs sequentially at specified times of the day. (Id. ¶ 4).

i. Delivery of Cable Programming

Traditionally, television signals were transmitted in analog form. (Horowitz Report ¶ 19). In other words, the signals were transmitted as a series of continuous waves. (Id.). Today, television signals are increasingly delivered in digital form. (See id. ¶ 35). Digital signals are transmitted as compressed data in the form of binary digits, or "bits." (Id. ¶¶ 19-20, 38). The number of bits that can be sent in a second is known as the "bitrate." (Id. ¶ 41). Digital signals allow for a greater variety in television programming — because more signals can be transmitted in the same space — as well as interactive services and, often, better audio and image quality than analog television. (Id. ¶¶ 39-42). The RS-DVR would be offered as part of Cablevision's digital cable service.

Digital cable delivery starts with programming owners sending feeds of their content to the cable company, which collects the feeds at a "head-end," a central facility that houses much of the software and hardware necessary to operate a cable system. (Hartson Report ¶ 18; Mitchko Decl. ¶ 12; Tr. 18). For linear channels, the cable company collects all of the feeds into an "aggregated programming stream" ("APS"). (Tr. 18). The APS is composed of packets of data, each 188 bytes in size.2 (Id.; Horowitz Report ¶ 46). Each packet is tagged with a "program identifier" ("PID") indicating the program to which it belongs. (Horowitz Report ¶ 47).

The APS is sent from the head-end to customers' homes through a process known as Quadrature Amplitude Modulation ("QAM"); the devices used to accomplish this process are called QAM modulators. (Hartson Report ¶ 29). QAM converts the digital signals into radio frequency ("RF") signals, which are more robust and better suited for transmission along a cable system's coaxial cable lines. (Tr. 19-20). The RF signals are sent over the coaxial network (the "RF Distribution Network"), which routes the signals to the various "nodes" or service groups — smaller cable systems connecting a group of homes — comprising the cable system. (Hartson Report ¶ 31). Each node is serviced by a particular QAM modulator. (Tr. 19-21). The RF signals are typically then routed to the customer's digital set-top box. (Hartson Report ¶ 32). The packets of the APS are filtered according to their PIDs and reassembled into a single program transport stream to be decrypted, decoded,3 and displayed. (Horowitz Report ¶ 47). To limit access to certain programming such as premium channels, the cable company encrypts the packets in the APS. (Id. ¶ 56). The set-top box has decryption hardware that "unlocks" the encrypted packets. (Id.).

ii. Video-on-Demand

Cable companies also provide certain services on an individual customer basis. Video-on-Demand (NOD") is one such service. VOD allows a customer, using an on-screen menu and the remote control, to view at any time programming selected by the cable company. (Hartson Report ¶ 39; Horowitz Report ¶¶ 57-58, 60). Pursuant to licenses negotiated with the programming owners, the cable company receives programming for VOD exhibition at its head-end, where the content is stored on computers. (Hartson Report ¶ 39). The cable company delivers the VOD content on extra channel frequencies that are not being used for linear programming. (Horowitz Report ¶ 59).

VOD also requires a "reverse" channel for each customer, so that the customer can communicate with the cable company to select the desired programming and control the playback (i.e. rewind, fast-forward, and pause). (Id. ¶ 60). These playback control functions are known as "trick modes." (Gilmer Report at 10). Cablevision offers VOD to its digital cable customers, pursuant to licensing agreements it has with the programming owners. (Turner Statement of Facts ("Turner SOF") ¶¶ 24-25, 38).

3. Recording Television Programming: VCRs and DVRs

VCRs, introduced for home use more than 25 years ago, provided the first practical means for television viewers to record programming. (Hartson Report ¶ 33; see Tr. 122-23)....

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Fox Broad. Co. v. Dish Network, L.C.C.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Central District of California
    • 7 Noviembre 2012
    ...deleted by the user or overwritten automatically to make room for a later-recorded program. See Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Cablevision Sys. Corp., 478 F.Supp.2d 607, 612 (S.D.N.Y.2007), reversed in part, vacated in part by Cablevision, 536 F.3d at 140. Nevertheless, it is not clear......
  • Wnet, Thirteen, Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. Aereo, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • 1 Abril 2013
    ...the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and issued an injunction against Cablevision. See Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Cablevision Sys. Corp., 478 F.Supp.2d 607 (S.D.N.Y.2007). The court found that the RS–DVR infringed the plaintiffs' reproduction right in two ways: (1) by creati......
  • Am. Broad. Cos. v. Aereo, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • 11 Julio 2012
    ...operated, Cablevision was engaged in a public performance of the plaintiffs' copyrighted works. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Cablevision Sys. Corp., 478 F.Supp.2d 607, 624 (S.D.N.Y.2007). In doing so, the district court rejected Cablevision's argument that any “performance is fundame......
  • Ticketmaster L.L.C. v. Rmg Technologies, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Central District of California
    • 15 Octubre 2007
    ... ... a copy under the Copyright Act.") See also Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Cablevision Systems Corp., 478 ... See Triad Sys. Corp. v. Southeastern Exp. Co., 64 F.3d 1330, 1338 (9th ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Advanced Copyright Issues On The Internet
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • 16 Abril 2014
    ...Inc., 557 U.S. 946 (2009). 29 Id. at 129-30. 30 Id. at 123-24, 127. 31 Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Cablevision Sys. Corp., 478 F. Supp. 2d 607, 621-22 (S.D.N.Y. 32 Cartoon Network, 536 F.3d 121 at 127. 33 Id. 34 Id. at 129. "The result might be different if only a single second of a......
3 books & journal articles
  • Paying for cable in Boston, watching it on a laptop in L.A.: does Slingbox violate federal copyright laws?
    • United States
    • Suffolk University Law Review Vol. 41 No. 1, December 2007
    • 22 Diciembre 2007
    ...in March 2007, and the case is currently in discovery. Cf. id. (136.) Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Cablevision Systems Corp., 478 F. Supp. 2d 607, 624 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) (granting plaintiff's motion for summary judgment); Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary......
  • Bouchat v. Bon-ton Department Stores, Inc.: claim preclusion, copyright law, and massive infringements.
    • United States
    • Harvard Journal of Law & Technology Vol. 21 No. 2, March 2008
    • 22 Marzo 2008
    ...for infringement because its device was capable of noninfringing uses); Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Cablevision Sys. Corp., 478 F. Supp. 2d 607 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) (holding that the provider of a digital video recording device and service that allowed recording of user-selected televisi......
  • Rs-dvr Slides Past Its First Obstacle and Gets the Pass for Full Implementation
    • United States
    • University of North Carolina School of Law North Carolina Journal of Law and Technology No. 10-2008, January 2008
    • Invalid date
    ...536 F.3d at 125-26 (citing the district court's opinion in Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Cablevision Sys. Corp. (Cablevision I), 478 F. Supp. 2d 607 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)). The exclusive rights associated with the ownership of a copyright include the (1) to reproduce the copyrighted work in......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT