Twohy Bros. Co. v. Ochoco Irr. Dist., Crook County

Decision Date05 December 1922
Citation210 P. 873,108 Or. 1
PartiesTWOHY BROS. CO. v. OCHOCO IRR. DIST., CROOK COUNTY, ET AL.
CourtOregon Supreme Court

In Banc.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County; Robert Tucker, Judge.

Action by the Twohy Bros. Company against the Ochoco Irrigation District, Crook County, and others. From a decree of dismissal, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

The plaintiff is a private corporation engaged in construction work. The defendant Ochoco irrigation district is a municipal corporation organized under the Oregon Irrigation District Law. Plaintiff prays for an accounting, and "that it be decreed that the reasonable value of the work done and materials furnished by plaintiff in the performance of said work is the full sum of $536,170.99, and that plaintiff be given a judgment against said district for any balance thereof that shall remain unpaid after said accounting," also for the cancellation of certain writings.

From plaintiff's averment, it has been paid the total sum of $302,469.33. The defendant alleges that it has paid to plaintiff the full sum of $309.007.02, and that said sum of money is equal to the value of all work done by plaintiff and all materials furnished under the alleged contract referred to in the amended complaint. A number of exhibits attached to plaintiff's amended complaint and made a part thereof too voluminous to be set forth in full herein, constitute a contract for the construction of a canal 15 1/2 miles in length and a dam for the purpose of impounding the waters of a stream known as Ochoco river.

On May 19, 1917, the irrigation district executed a written agreement with Clark-Kendall & Co. reading, in part, as follows:

"Whereas Ochoco irrigation district, for the purpose of procuring necessary reclamation works and acquiring the necessary property and rights therefor, and for otherwise carrying out the provisions of the law relative to irrigation districts, has heretofore duly authorized an issue of bonds in an amount not to exceed $1,100,000; and

"Whereas the board of directors of said district deem it for the best interests of the district to use said bonds, or so much thereof as may be necessary, at their par value, for the purchase or acquisition of canals, reservoir sites water rights, or other works, or for the construction, or in payment for the construction of canals, reservoirs pumping plants, or other works to be used for the irrigation or drainage of land in the district, or any part of said lands; and

"Whereas, Clark-Kendall & Co., of Portland, Or., have had an engineer make an examination of the district for the purpose of making an estimate of the cost of the construction of canals, reservoirs, pumping plants, or other works to be used for the irrigation or drainage of the land in the district; and

"Whereas, the estimates made by said engineer on the cost of the main dam for the reservoir and the first 15 1/2 miles of the main canal aggregate approximately $409,500, as shown by said estimate for said purposes hereto attached and marked Exhibit A; and

"Whereas, said last-mentioned estimates are in part based on definite rates therein particularly set forth, which said measurements and classifications of material as the work progresses may change and increase or decrease the cost thereof, but which at the present time are incapable of being made more definite than as in said estimate contained; and

"Whereas, said estimates for the said main dam for the reservoir and the first 15 1/2 miles of said main canal have been examined and approved by the project engineer and by the board of directors of said district; and

"Whereas, the board of directors * * * have this day duly passed a resolution authorizing the president and secretary for and on behalf of said district to enter into a contract with Clark-Kendall & Co. for the construction of said main dam and the first 15 1/2 miles of said main ditch:

"Now, therefore, for and in consideration of the premises and for one ($1.00) dollar and other valuable consideration, it is hereby agreed:

"(1) Clark-Kendall & Co. shall employ a contractor for the construction of the main dam and the first 15 1/2 miles of main ditch at and for the price set forth in said estimates, and in payment therefor shall accept said bonds, or so much as may be necessary, at their par value, provided, however, that said bonds to the extent of 80 per cent. of the estimated amount of the construction shall be delivered to said Clark-Kendall & Co. or their assigns, as herein-after provided, upon their filing a surety bond satisfactory to the district for the completion of the work according to specifications. * * *

"(4) The specifications for said construction may be modified, changed or added to during the progress of the work. * * *"

On August 16, 1917, a supplemental agreement was entered into between the Ochoco irrigation district and Clark-Kendall & Co. for the construction of the proposed main dam for the reservoir and the first 15 1/2 miles of the main ditch, which provides, among other things, that:

"Whereas, plans and specifications for said work had not been adopted and approved on said date (May 19, 1917); and

"Whereas, plans and specifications therefor have subsequently been adopted and approved:

"Now, therefore, it is hereby agreed:

"First. Clark-Kendall & Co. shall employ a contractor for the construction of said proposed main dam and the first 15 1/2 miles of main ditch, who shall construct same in accordance with the plans and specifications therefor and shall be paid in accordance with the estimates marked A and incorporated in said contract of May 19, 1917. * * *

"It is understood that the total amount to be paid said Clark-Kendall & Co. under said contract of May 19, 1917, the plans and specifications and this supplement thereto, may exceed $400,000.00, and in that event it is hereby agreed that such amount or amounts in excess of $400,000.00 shall be paid in cash from the proceeds of the sale of the $500,000.00, par value, of the bonds of the district. * * *

"The foregoing amounts are predicated upon estimates of the work now contemplated by the plans and specifications."

An acceptance of the specifications was made by Clark-Kendall & Co., for themselves and their assigns, and the contract was duly assigned to plaintiff, Twohy Bros. Company.

The following is taken from the acceptance of the specifications made a part of the complaint:

"(a) We, or our assigns, are to perform all labor and services and furnish all materials, plant, and equipment necessary to complete the work contemplated under this contract and as listed in Exhibit A. * * *

"(c) All work to be done under this contract on the first 15 1/2 miles of the main canal must be completed * * * May 1, 1918. * * *

"(d) * * * Ochoco dam and appurtenances must be completed * * * on or before May 1, 1919. * * *

"(e) Whenever in this contract the words 'pay,' 'payment,' 'money,' or words of equal import are used, it is understood that for all amounts up to $400,000.00 payment in bonds of the Ochoco irrigation district, at their par value, is meant. For all amounts over and above a total of $400,000.00, payment in cash is meant. * * *

"(f) The amount to be paid for work or services performed or materials furnished under the terms of this contract shall be a sum equal to the amount of the actual work done and materials furnished as determined by the engineer under each item in Exhibit A, multiplied by the unit prices applicable to each such item. * * *"

Under the heading "General Conditions," set forth in Exhibit E, we have:

"The word 'contract' shall mean collectively all of the covenants, terms, and stipulations contained in the various portions of this contract, to wit, agreement, bond, specifications, acceptance of specifications, and contract drawing. The word 'specifications' shall mean collectively all of the terms and stipulations contained in those portions of the contract known as the general conditions, general specifications, and detailed specifications. * * *

"The words 'contract price' shall mean either the unit price or prices, or flat price or prices. * * *

"The cost and expense of said work and material shall be borne by the contractor."

On September 15, 1917, the plaintiff and defendant Ochoco irrigation district entered into a written agreement relating to the manner in which the money realized from sale of bonds should be deposited and drawn upon. Twohy Bros. Company gave the irrigation district a surety bond for $400,000, and entered upon the performance of its contract by furnishing material and labor in the matter of the construction of the dam and main canal of the Ochoco irrigation district. After doing a great deal of work, but before the completion thereof, the plaintiff abandoned its contract. A suit was instituted by this defendant in the circuit court of the state of Oregon in and for Crook county, for the purpose of restraining Twohy Bros. Company from removing its supplies, equipment, and machinery from their "present location at or upon or connected with the said dam, or from injuring or destroying or interfering with the operation of the same, or in any manner preventing plaintiff from using each and all of said tools, equipment, or supplies."

The defendant in the present proceeding filed an answer to plaintiff's complaint. For a first, further, and separate answer it averred:

"That prior to the execution of the several instruments signed by T. H. La Follett and R. L. Schee, at the time when the said T. H. La Follett and R. L. Schee were respectively the president and secretary of this defendant, the board of directors of this defendant had given no notice, by publication or otherwise, of their...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Twohy Bros. Co. v. Ochoco Irr. Dist., Crook County
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • 12 Junio 1923
    ...In Banc. Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County; Robert Tucker, Judge. On petition for rehearing. Affirmed. For former opinion, see 210 P. 873. E. B. Seabrook, of Portland (James G. Wilson Malarkey, Seabrook & Dibble, all of Portland, on the brief), for appellant. John K. Kollock and W......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT