Tyler v. Brown-Service Funeral Homes Co.

Decision Date26 February 1948
Docket Number6 Div. 585.
Citation34 So.2d 203,250 Ala. 295
PartiesTYLER v. BROWN-SERVICE FUNERAL HOMES CO.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Gibson & Hewitt, of Birmingham, for appellant.

Lange, Simpson, Robinson & Somerville, of Birmingham, for appellee.

LIVINGSTON Justice.

The single count of the complaint is in words and figures as follows: 'The plaintiff claims of the defendant the sum of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00), as damages, for that heretofore, on, towit, January 21, 1946, the defendant was in the business of operating ambulances in Jefferson County Alabama, for hire or reward, which said ambulances were being used and operated for the purpose of transporting sick and injured people from hospitals to their homes, and from their homes to the hospitals. Plaintiff further avers that on said date, as aforesaid, her husband, Fred B. Tyler, was seriously ill at the Hillman Hospital, in Birmingham, Jefferson County Alabama, and at said time and place aforesaid the defendant's agents, servants or employees, while acting within the line and scope of their employment as such undertook to transport plaintiff's husband, Fred B Tyler, without plaintiff's consent from the said Hillman Hospital, as aforesaid, to the home of plaintiff and the said Fred B. Tyler, approximately three miles northeast of Huffman, on the old Springville Highway, in Jefferson County Alabama. Plaintiff further avers that when the defendant's agents, servants or employees, while acting within the line and scope of their employment as such arrived with plaintiff's husband, Fred B. Tyler, at the said home of the said plaintiff and the said Fred B. Tyler, as aforesaid, said home was unoccupied, and not heated and at said time and place aforesaid, the defendant's agents, servants or employees, while acting within the line and scope of their employment as such, negligently left plaintiff's husband, who was seriously ill, in said home, where he was unattended, and was not provided with sufficient warmth to keep him from being cold. Plaintiff avers that, towit, several hours after the defendant's agents, servants or employees, while acting within the line and scope of their employment as such, negligently left her said husband, Fred B. Tyler, unattended in said home, which was not heated, she went to the said home and found her said husband, Fred B. Tyler, unattended in a cold and almost freezing condition, and plaintiff avers that, as a proximate consequence thereof, she suffered great mental anguish. Plaintiff avers that her said mental anguish was proximately caused by the negligence of the defendant's agents, servants or employees, while acting within the line and scope of their employment as such, in that the said defendant's agents, servants or...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Amodio v. Cunningham
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • August 12, 1980
    ...1184. See generally Brandfon, "Emotional Distress and Bystander Recovery," 53 Conn.B.J. 231 (1979).5 See also Tyler v. Brown-Service Funeral Homes Co., 250 Ala. 295, 34 So.2d 203; Slovensky v. Birmingham News Co., 358 So.2d 474 (Ala.Civ.App.); Woodman v. Dever, 367 So.2d 1061 (Fla.App.); So......
  • Amaya v. Home Ice, Fuel & Supply Co.
    • United States
    • California Supreme Court
    • March 12, 1963
    ... ... of the 'impact rule.' (For a more relevant Alabama decision, see Tyler v. Brown-Service Funeral Homes Co. (1948, Ala.) 250 Ala. 295, 34 So.2d ... ...
  • Bovsun v. Sanperi
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • February 23, 1984
    ...also rejected the Dillon v. Legg rule of liability to the foreseeable observer of an accident. (Tyler v. Brown-Service Funeral Homes Co., 250 Ala. 295, 34 So.2d 203; Slovensky v. Birmingham News Co., 358 So.2d 474, 477 [Ala.Civ.App.]; Keck v. Jackson, 122 Ariz. 114, 593 P.2d 668 [en banc]; ......
  • Hitaffer v. Argonne Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • May 29, 1950
    ...3 D.C.Code 1940, §§ 36-501, 36-502, 33 U.S.C.A. § 901 note. 4 44 Stat. 1427, 33 U.S.C.A. §§ 907, 908. 5 Tyler v. Brown-Service Funeral Homes Co., 1948, 250 Ala. 295, 34 So.2d 203; Giggey v. Gallagher Transp. Co., 1937, 101 Colo. 258, 72 P.2d 1100; Marri v. Stamford St. R. Co., 1911, 84 Conn......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT