Tyler v. Tatoian

Decision Date20 April 2016
Citation321 Conn. 908,135 A.3d 710 (Mem)
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court
PartiesJay M. TYLER et al. v. Richard TATOIAN.

Jay M. Tyler, self-represented, and Bruce D. Tyler, self-represented, in support of the petition.

Bruce S. Beck, Manchester, in opposition.

The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 164 Conn.App. 82, 137 A.3d 801 (2016), is denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
23 cases
  • Scholz v. Epstein
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • June 16, 2020
    ...claims fell under exception to absolute immunity for causes of action alleging improper use of judicial system), cert. denied, 321 Conn. 908, 135 A.3d 710 (2016). "[I]n expanding the doctrine of absolute immunity to bar claims beyond defamation, [our Supreme Court] has sought to ensure that......
  • Dorfman v. Smith
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • March 29, 2022
    ...actions during litigation. See id., at 628, 79 A.3d 60 ; Tyler v. Tatoian , 164 Conn. App. 82, 92, 137 A.3d 801, cert. denied, 321 Conn. 908, 135 A.3d 710 (2016). This expansion is premised on the rationale that, "because the privilege protects the communication, the nature of the theory [o......
  • Scholz v. Epstein
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • September 29, 2021
    ...the trial court's subject matter jurisdiction. See, e.g., Tyler v. Tatoian , 164 Conn. App. 82, 87, 137 A.3d 801, cert. denied, 321 Conn. 908, 135 A.3d 710 (2016) ; see also Chadha v. Charlotte Hungerford Hospital , 272 Conn. 776, 787, 865 A.2d 1163 (2005) (like colorable claim of sovereign......
  • Simons v. Town of Sherman Board of Selectmen
    • United States
    • Connecticut Superior Court
    • March 1, 2019
    ...based on allegedly defamatory statement. See Tyler v. Tatoian, 164 Conn.App. 82, 88, 137 A.3d 801, cert. denied, 321 Conn . 908, 135 A.3d 710 (2016). However, Wilson has not cited, nor has the court Connecticut authority for the proposition that the absolute immunity doctrine is applicable ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT