U.S. Dept. of Health & Human Services v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, AFL-CI
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit) |
| Citation | 828 F.2d 1080 |
| Docket Number | AFL-CI,No. 86-2619,L |
| Parties | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Respondent. American Federation of Government Employees,ocal 1923, Intervenor. |
| Decision Date | 23 September 1987 |
Page 1080
v.
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Respondent.
American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, Local
1923, Intervenor.
Fourth Circuit.
Prior report: 4th Cir., 822 F.2d 430.
Page 1081
ORDER
The petitioner's petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc were submitted this Court. In a requested poll of the Court a majority of the judges voted to grant rehearing in banc.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that rehearing in banc is granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall be calendared for oral argument at the December session of Court. The parties shall submit six additional copies of their briefs and petitioner shall submit ten additional copies of the joint appendix.
Entered at the direction of Judge Murnaghan.
To continue reading
Request your trial
1 practice notes
-
CX Reinsurance Co. v. Johnson, 19-1516
...from the definitions given in Rules 54 and 58. Indeed, we have previously noted that the meanings must be shared. See Jackson , 828 F.2d at 1080 n.2 (indicating that the best "reading of the Local Rule's reference to ‘judgment’ in ‘entry of judgment’ is as a reference to the judgment contem......
1 cases
-
CX Reinsurance Co. v. Johnson, No. 19-1516
...from the definitions given in Rules 54 and 58. Indeed, we have previously noted that the meanings must be shared. See Jackson , 828 F.2d at 1080 n.2 (indicating that the best "reading of the Local Rule's reference to ‘judgment’ in ‘entry of judgment’ is as a reference to the judgment contem......