U.S. v. Anderson, 91-50113

Decision Date22 April 1993
Docket NumberNo. 91-50113,91-50113
Citation990 F.2d 1163
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony Dwayne ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

Before POOLE, WIGGINS and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The opinion filed July 13, 1992 and appearing at 970 F.2d 602 (9th Cir.1992) is amended as follows:

1. The second complete sentence on page 607, beginning "The government agreed to a stipulation ..." is stricken, and replaced with "The government entered into a specific agreement to charge "a quantity of cocaine (less than five kilos)." In Anderson's view, this amounted to a stipulation as to the maximum quantity of drugs he distributed."

2. The text of footnote 8, 970 F.2d at 608 n. 8, beginning "While the Parole Commission ...", is stricken from the opinion.

With these amendments, the panel has voted unanimously to deny the petition for rehearing.

The petition for rehearing is DENIED.

To continue reading

Request your trial
36 cases
  • Buckley, v. Terhune
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Central District of California
    • December 6, 2002
    ...be fulfilled"); Gunn, 263 F.3d at 969-970; United States v. Anderson, 970 F.2d 602, 607 (9th Cir.1992), amended on other grounds, 990 F.2d 1163 (9th Cir. 1993); United States v. Travis, 735 F.2d 1129, 1132 (9th Cir.1984); see also United States v. Peglera, 33 F.3d 412, 414 (4th Cir.1994) ("......
  • State v. Bisson
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • March 16, 2006
    ...v. De la Fuente, 8 F.3d 1333, 1338 (9th Cir.1993) (quoting United States v. Anderson, 970 F.2d 602, 607 (9th Cir.1992), amended by 990 F.2d 1163 (1993)). If Bisson's plea agreement was ambiguous, as the majority concedes, he is entitled to specific performance of the plea agreement he reaso......
  • United States v. Washington
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Montana
    • August 22, 2012
    ...v. Chiu, 109 F.3d 624 (9th Cir.1997) (proffer agreement); United States v. Anderson, 970 F.2d 602, 606 (9th Cir.1992), as amended, 990 F.2d 1163 (1993) (plea agreement); United States v. Plummer, 941 F.2d 799, 803 (9th Cir.1991) (informal, written immunity agreement). The Defendants have no......
  • U.S. v. Lewis
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Kansas
    • April 29, 1997
    ...has the discretion to fashion appropriate relief. See United States v. Anderson, 970 F.2d 602, 608 (9th Cir.1992), amended, 990 F.2d 1163 (9th Cir.1993). Although no breach occurred here, the plea agreement and plea are invalid, and the district court should return the parties to the status......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT