U.S. v. Anderson, 91-50113
Decision Date | 22 April 1993 |
Docket Number | No. 91-50113,91-50113 |
Citation | 990 F.2d 1163 |
Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony Dwayne ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Before POOLE, WIGGINS and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
The opinion filed July 13, 1992 and appearing at 970 F.2d 602 (9th Cir.1992) is amended as follows:
1. The second complete sentence on page 607, beginning "The government agreed to a stipulation ..." is stricken, and replaced with
2. The text of footnote 8, 970 F.2d at 608 n. 8, beginning "While the Parole Commission ...", is stricken from the opinion.
With these amendments, the panel has voted unanimously to deny the petition for rehearing.
The petition for rehearing is DENIED.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Buckley, v. Terhune
...be fulfilled"); Gunn, 263 F.3d at 969-970; United States v. Anderson, 970 F.2d 602, 607 (9th Cir.1992), amended on other grounds, 990 F.2d 1163 (9th Cir. 1993); United States v. Travis, 735 F.2d 1129, 1132 (9th Cir.1984); see also United States v. Peglera, 33 F.3d 412, 414 (4th Cir.1994) ("......
-
State v. Bisson
...v. De la Fuente, 8 F.3d 1333, 1338 (9th Cir.1993) (quoting United States v. Anderson, 970 F.2d 602, 607 (9th Cir.1992), amended by 990 F.2d 1163 (1993)). If Bisson's plea agreement was ambiguous, as the majority concedes, he is entitled to specific performance of the plea agreement he reaso......
-
United States v. Washington
...v. Chiu, 109 F.3d 624 (9th Cir.1997) (proffer agreement); United States v. Anderson, 970 F.2d 602, 606 (9th Cir.1992), as amended, 990 F.2d 1163 (1993) (plea agreement); United States v. Plummer, 941 F.2d 799, 803 (9th Cir.1991) (informal, written immunity agreement). The Defendants have no......
-
U.S. v. Lewis
...has the discretion to fashion appropriate relief. See United States v. Anderson, 970 F.2d 602, 608 (9th Cir.1992), amended, 990 F.2d 1163 (9th Cir.1993). Although no breach occurred here, the plea agreement and plea are invalid, and the district court should return the parties to the status......