U.S. v. Bacca-Beltran
| Decision Date | 06 June 1985 |
| Docket Number | BACCA-BELTRA,83-5065,D,Nos. 82-6161,s. 82-6161 |
| Citation | 764 F.2d 747 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Omar Hermanefendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert CHEMALY, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit |
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida; Sidney M. Aronovitz and Donald J. Porter, Judges.
ON SUA SPONTE RECONSIDERATION
(Opinion September 20, 1984, 11th Cir., 1984, 741 F.2d 1361).
Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HENDERSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
On the Court's own motion, and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor thereof,
It is ORDERED that the order entered December 18, 1984 granting a rehearing en banc in these appeals is hereby VACATED. The opinions of the panel in these causes filed September 20, 1984 are hereby REINSTATED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
U.S. v. Singleton
...United States v. Chemaly, 741 F.2d 1346, 1353-54 & n. 2 (11th Cir.1984), reh'g en banc vacated and panel opinion reinstated, 764 F.2d 747 (11th Cir.1985) (en banc); United States v. Soto-Soto, 598 F.2d 545, 550 (9th Cir.1979); United States v. Genser, 582 F.2d 292, 307-09 (3d Cir.1978). Alt......
-
US v. Ezeiruaku, Crim. A. No. 90-00230-01.
...reh'g en banc granted, United States v. Bacca-Beltran, 741 F.2d 1361 (11th Cir.1984), reinstated en banc, United States v. Bacca-Beltran, 764 F.2d 747 (11th Cir.1985), reversed the conviction under § 1105 of an individual for attempting to transport excess amounts of currency from Miami Int......
-
U.S. v. Benevento
...the violating officer. United States v. Chemaly, 741 F.2d 1346, 1358-59 (11th Cir.1984) (Tjoflat, J., dissenting), reinstated, 764 F.2d 747 (1985) (en banc). Accordingly, we conclude that the district court properly denied the Beneventos' motions to suppress the currency C. Denial of motion......
-
United States v. Benevento
...840 (1981); United States v. Swarovski, 592 F.2d 131, 133 (2d Cir.1979). 3 741 F.2d 1346, 1358 (11th Cir.1984), reinstated, 764 F.2d 747 (1985) (en banc); United States v. Turner, 639 F.Supp. 982, 992 (E.D.N.Y.1986). 4 350 U.S. 214, 217-18, 76 S.Ct. 292, 294, 100 L.Ed. 233 (1956). 5 See Uni......