U.S. v. Battle

• Decision Date: 30 April 2003
• Docket Number: Civil Action No. 1:01-cv-2620-ODE.,Criminal Case No. 1:95-CR-528-ODE.
• Citation: 264 F.Supp.2d 1088
• Parties: UNITED STATES of America, v. Anthony George BATTLE.
• Court: U.S. District Court — Northern District of Georgia

264 F.Supp.2d 1088

UNITED STATES of America, v. Anthony George BATTLE.

Criminal Case No. 1:95-CR-528-ODE.

Civil Action No. 1:01-cv-2620-ODE.

United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division.

April 30, 2003.

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED

William H. McKinnon, Assistant United States Attorney, Atlanta, GA, for Government.

Margaret O'Donnell, McNally & O'Donnell, P.S.C., Frankfort, KY, P. Bruce Kirwan, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant.

ORDER

ORINDA D. EVANS, District Judge.

This federal death penalty case is before the Court for a ruling on Defendant's motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Defendant seeks to set aside his conviction and his sentence.

The Court having heard the evidence at trial, the evidence presented in support of Defendant's habeas claims, and having the benefit of the arguments of counsel will set forth below its legal conclusions and, where specifically indicated its findings of fact. For the reasons stated, Defendant's motion is DENIED.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

                I.  INTRODUCTION...............................................................1097
                II.   CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE FEDERAL DEATH PENALTY ACT
                       18 U.S.C. §§ 3591-3597 .......................................1099
                      A. Defendant's Challenge to His Sentence.................................1099
                      B. Constitutionality of the Federal Death Penalty Act under the Fifth
                             Amendment Indictment Clause ......................................1103
                      C. Challenge to the FDPA's Evidentiary Standard..........................1105
                III. COMPETENCY-RELATED CLAIMS.................................................1107
                      A. Authority of Magistrate Judge to Preside at Competency Hearing........1107
                      B. Substantive Competency Claim .........................................1108
                         1. Competency Proceedings.............................................1109
                         2. Trial Proceedings..................................................1120
                         3. Kearns' Declaration................................................1122
                         4. 2002 Psychiatric Report............................................1123
                         5. Findings and Conclusions...........................................1125
                      C. Continuance to Permit Further Competency Evaluation..................1128
                IV. CONTROL OF DEFENSE OF INSANITY............................................1129
                V.  CLAIMED INVESTIGATIVE FAILURES OF COUNSEL.................................1137
                    A. Adequacy of Social History Investigation...............................1137
                    B. Mitigating Mental Health Evidence......................................1143
                

                     C. Pesticide Exposure.....................................................1149
                     D. Defendant's Odd Behavior While in Prison Before the Murder.............1150
                     E. Defendant's Complaints of Implants before Washington's Murder..........1151
                        1. Complaints to Inmates...............................................1151
                        2. Complaints to Family Members........................................1156
                      F. Findings and Conclusions .............................................1161
                VI.   FAILURE TO PROVIDE INFORMATION TO MENTAL HEALTH
                       EXPERTS.................................................................1161
                      A. Disciplinary Records..................................................1161
                      B. Chaotic and Violent Environment at USP-Atlanta........................1162
                      C. CT Scan Results.......................................................1163
                      D. Information Concerning Defendant's Social/Family Background and the
                          Development of His Mental Illness....................................1167
                VII. MISCELLANEOUS OTHER CLAIMS OF INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE
                         OF COUNSEL IN VARIOUS STAGES OF THE CRIMINAL
                         PROCESS...............................................................1168
                      A. Preindictment Phase...................................................1169
                      B. Pretrial Phase........................................................1169
                         1. Limitation on Butner Evaluation ...................................1169
                         2. Neurological Examination...........................................1170
                         3. Continuance of Trial...............................................1170
                         4. Exclusion of Robert Willis' Testimony..............................1171
                         5. Appointment of a Treating Psychiatrist.............................1173
                         6. Testimony of Counsel at Competency Hearing.........................1174
                         7. Daubert Hearing....................................................1175
                         8. Failure to Coordinate Work.........................................1176
                      C. Trial Phase...........................................................1178
                         1. Voir Dire..........................................................1178
                         2. Change of Clothes..................................................1179
                         3. Expert Testimony on Effect of Defendant's Mental Illness...........1179
                         4. Expert Explanation of Outburst in Courtroom And Defendant's
                              May 6,1995 Telephone Conversation with His Father................1180
                         5. Failure to Call John Pannell as a Trial Witness....................1180
                         6. Evidence that the Government Can Safely Incarcerate Defendant......1181
                         7. Conditions of Defendant's Confinement at the Atlanta Pretrial
                              Detention Center.................................................1183
                         8. BOP Role in Bringing About Washington's Death......................1183
                         9. Preparation of Defendant to Testify at the Guilt Phase and
                              Penalty Phase of the Trial.......................................1184
                         10. Deterioration of Defendant at Trial...............................1185
                         11. Failure to Call Dr. Rogers as Part of Defendant's Case in Chief...1185
                         12. Failure to Investigate, Seek to Set Aside, and Mitigate 1987
                               Conviction......................................................1186
                         13. Exclusion of Donovan Testimony....................................1187
                         14. Jury Instruction On Unadjudicated Criminal Conduct................1188
                         15. Jury Instruction that Life Sentence Defendant was Serving was a
                               Parolable Offense...............................................1189
                      D. Appeal................................................................1189
                VIII. JUROR MISCONDUCT.........................................................1190
                      A. Jurors Sleeping.......................................................1190
                      B. Other Juror Misconduct................................................1192
                         1. Presence of Bible and Discussion of Religious Scripture During
                           the Trial..........................................................1192
                         2. Presence of Alternate Jurors During Guilt Phase Deliberations.....1193
                         3. Premature Penalty Deliberations...................................1194
                         4. Cumulative Effect of Jury Misconduct..............................1194
                

                IX.   TRIAL COURT ERRORS .....................................................1194
                      A. Limitation on the Penalty Phase Testimony of Defense Social Historian
                           and Social Worker Jan Vogelsang....................................1194
                      B. Discharge of Jurors Craft and Tooley.................................1196
                      C. Refusal to Permit Juror Craft to Attend the Trial after She was
                           Dismissed as a Juror...............................................1197
                      D. Failure to Instruct the Jury on the Consequences of a Not Guilty by
                          Reason of Insanity Verdict..........................................1198
                      E. Insufficient Evidence of "Heinous, Cruel and Depraved" Aggravating
                           Circumstance.......................................................1199
                X.   BIAS OF TRIAL JUDGE......................................................1200
                XI.  PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT.................................................1201
                XII.  CONFLICT ISSUES.........................................................1206
                      A. Drs. Johnson and Hazelrigg...........................................1206
                      B. Trial Counsel........................................................1206
                XIII. VIOLATION OF RIGHT TO MEANINGFUL APPELLATE REVIEW.......................1207
                XIV. NEW TRIAL REQUEST........................................................1207
                XV.  CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF ERRORS..............................................1209
                XVI.   DEATH PENALTY CRUEL AND UNUSUAL........................................1209
                XVII.  CONCLUSION.............................................................1209
                

I. INTRODUCTION

On November 21, 1995, Defendant was charged in a indictment with the murder of D'Antonio Washington, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1118. The indictment charged that:

[o]n or about December 21, 1994, [Defendant] while confined in a federal correctional institution, the United States Penitentiary at Atlanta, Georgia, under a sentence of life imprisonment ... did unlawfully and with malice aforethought commit the murder of D'Antonio Washington, by beating [him] with a hammer ...

Defendant entered a plea of not guilty on December 4, 1995. He simultaneously filed a notice of intent to rely on the defense of insanity at the time of the offense.

On July 26, 1996, the Government filed the statutorily required Notice of Intent to Seek the Death Penalty. See 18 U.S.C. 3593(a). The notice referenced the intent or gateway factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3591(a)(2)¹ and listed five statutory aggravating factors² along with several nonstatutory aggravating factors which the Government sought to prove during the proceedings. After a...