U.S. v. Bentley-Smith, BENTLEY-SMITH and E

CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
Writing for the CourtBefore JOHNSON, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA; PER CURIAM; Johnson; JOHNSON
Citation2 F.3d 1368
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomasdsil M. Elledge, Jr., a/k/a Ken Elledge, Defendants-Appellants.
Docket NumberNo. 91-3427,BENTLEY-SMITH and E,91-3427
Decision Date20 September 1993
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
120 practice notes
  • United States v. Thompson, No. 12–31203.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • November 18, 2013
    ...1859, 114 L.Ed.2d 395 (1991). This court does not overturn such factual findings absent clear error. See United States v. Bentley–Smith, 2 F.3d 1368, 1372 (5th Cir.1993). These factual findings warrant great deference, because the district court “observ[es] the voir dire, know[s] the layout......
  • U.S. v. Webster, B-L
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • December 3, 1998
    ...court must determine whether the claimant has carried his burden of proving purposeful discrimination." United States v. Bentley-Smith, 2 F.3d 1368, 1373 (5th Cir.1993); see also United States v. Huey, 76 F.3d 638, 640-41 (5th Cir.1996). The party making the claim of purposeful discriminati......
  • U.S. v. Dupre, No. 95-30275
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • July 11, 1997
    ...Their motions were denied. We review the denial of a motion for mistrial for abuse of discretion. See United States v. Bentley-Smith, 2 F.3d 1368, 1378 (5th Cir.1993). Under the Sixth Amendment, a criminal defendant has the right to present witnesses to establish his defense without fear of......
  • Kandies v. Polk, No. 03-9.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • September 24, 2004
    ...(per curiam) (rejecting prosecutor's explanation that he "just [had] a feeling about him"). But see United States v. Bentley-Smith, 2 F.3d 1368, 1375 (5th Cir.1993) (per curiam) (stating that a prosecutor's intuition, standing alone, is a sufficient race-neutral reason for purposes of Batso......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
115 cases
  • Kandies v. Polk, No. 03-9.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • September 24, 2004
    ...(per curiam) (rejecting prosecutor's explanation that he "just [had] a feeling about him"). But see United States v. Bentley-Smith, 2 F.3d 1368, 1375 (5th Cir.1993) (per curiam) (stating that a prosecutor's intuition, standing alone, is a sufficient race-neutral reason for purposes of Batso......
  • State v. Jones, No. 15902
    • United States
    • New Mexico Court of Appeals of New Mexico
    • November 30, 1995
    ...strike peremptory challenges based on similar grounds such as body language, eye contact and the like. See United States v. Bentley-Smith, 2 F.3d 1368, 1374 (5th Cir.1993) (per curiam) (eye contact); United States v. Cartlidge, 808 F.2d 1064, 1070-71 (5th Cir.1987) (recognizing lack of eye ......
  • People v. Williams, No. S030553.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (California)
    • June 19, 2013
    ...and intuitions.’ ” [56 Cal.4th 721]( Caldwell v. Maloney (1st Cir.1998) 159 F.3d 639, 651; see also U.S. v. Bentley–Smith (5th Cir.1993) 2 F.3d 1368, 1375 [“An attorney who claims that he or she struck a potential juror because of intuition alone, without articulating a specific factual bas......
  • People v. Williams, No. S030553.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (California)
    • June 19, 2013
    ...and intuitions.’ ” [56 Cal.4th 721]( Caldwell v. Maloney (1st Cir.1998) 159 F.3d 639, 651; see also U.S. v. Bentley–Smith (5th Cir.1993) 2 F.3d 1368, 1375 [“An attorney who claims that he or she struck a potential juror because of intuition alone, without articulating a specific factual bas......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT