U.S. v. Bowdach, No. 76-2258
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | Before THORNBERRY, GODBOLD and FAY; FAY; For any offense against the United States, the offender may, by any justice or judge of the United States, or by any United States magistrate, or by any chancellor, judge of a supreme or superior court, chief |
| Citation | 561 F.2d 1160 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. Gary BOWDACH, Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee. |
| Docket Number | No. 76-2258 |
| Decision Date | 26 October 1977 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
173 practice notes
-
People v. Carney, Cr. 22047
...906, 909-910, and cases cited; accord, United States v. Allen (9th Cir.1980) 675 F.2d 1373, 1382; United States v. Bowdach (5th Cir.1977) 561 F.2d 1160, 1168-1169.) The underlying rationale for the protective sweep doctrine is, of course, the exigent circumstances exception to the warrant r......
-
State v. Bletsch, No. 17340.
...(3d Cir.1982); [and] evidence of crimes for which the defendant was indicted but neither tried nor convicted; United States v. Bowdach, 561 F.2d 1160, Page 1003 (5th Cir.1977).... Generally, due process does not require that information considered by the trial judge prior to sentencing meet......
-
Rios v. State, 14-18-00886-CR
...a danger to that police officer or to other people in the area.") (citing Reasor, 12 S.W.3d at 816-17); cf. United States v. Bowdach, 561 F.2d 1160, 1168 (5th Cir. 1977) ("The law in this circuit holds that police officers have a right to conduct a quick and cursory check of a residence whe......
-
Arthur v. State, CR-91-718
...48 (Ala.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1079, 108 S.Ct. 1061, 98 L.Ed.2d 1023 (1988). "As the court said in [United States v. Bowdach, 561 F.2d 1160 (5th Cir.1977) " 'Faretta [v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975) ] does not hold that a defendant has a Sixth Amendm......
Request a trial to view additional results
173 cases
-
People v. Carney, Cr. 22047
...906, 909-910, and cases cited; accord, United States v. Allen (9th Cir.1980) 675 F.2d 1373, 1382; United States v. Bowdach (5th Cir.1977) 561 F.2d 1160, 1168-1169.) The underlying rationale for the protective sweep doctrine is, of course, the exigent circumstances exception to the warrant r......
-
State v. Bletsch, No. 17340.
...(3d Cir.1982); [and] evidence of crimes for which the defendant was indicted but neither tried nor convicted; United States v. Bowdach, 561 F.2d 1160, Page 1003 (5th Cir.1977).... Generally, due process does not require that information considered by the trial judge prior to sentencing meet......
-
Rios v. State, 14-18-00886-CR
...a danger to that police officer or to other people in the area.") (citing Reasor, 12 S.W.3d at 816-17); cf. United States v. Bowdach, 561 F.2d 1160, 1168 (5th Cir. 1977) ("The law in this circuit holds that police officers have a right to conduct a quick and cursory check of a residence whe......
-
Arthur v. State, CR-91-718
...48 (Ala.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1079, 108 S.Ct. 1061, 98 L.Ed.2d 1023 (1988). "As the court said in [United States v. Bowdach, 561 F.2d 1160 (5th Cir.1977) " 'Faretta [v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975) ] does not hold that a defendant has a Sixth Amendm......
Request a trial to view additional results