U.S. v. Brown, 93-3188

Decision Date03 March 1994
Docket NumberNo. 93-3188,93-3188
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Edward Eugene BROWN, Appellant.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit

Wallace L. Taylor, Cedar Rapids, IA, for appellant.

Patrick J. Reinert, Asst. U.S. Atty., Cedar Rapids, IA, for appellee.

Before McMILLIAN, MAGILL, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Edward Eugene Brown appeals his 84-month sentence imposed by the district court 1 after he pleaded guilty to drug charges. We affirm.

Pursuant to a plea agreement, Brown pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute cocaine base within 1000 feet of a public playground in Fort Dodge, Iowa, in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841(a)(1), 846, and 860. Brown agreed in his plea agreement that information he provided to authorities could--and would--be used by the court and probation office to determine the length of his sentence. At his plea hearing, Brown testified that he acted as a "middleman," helping people to buy cocaine base by taking them to suppliers, setting up transactions, and receiving in exchange small quantities of cocaine base for his personal use.

According to the presentence report (PSR), confidential informant James Lawbaugh bought some cocaine base from Brown himself and also bought cocaine base in Brown's presence. Brown's debriefing revealed that he was involved with additional cocaine base from other transactions. Brown described the transactions by stating the price of the cocaine base in each instance, and the probation officer converted those amounts to grams assuming that a $20 rock of cocaine base weighed approximately .1 gram. The PSR thus assessed a total of 9.76 grams of cocaine base. The PSR set the base offense level at 26 under U.S.S.G. Sec. 2D1.1(c)(9) (5-20 grams of cocaine base), added two levels because of the proximity to the public playground, and subtracted three levels for acceptance of responsibility, for a total offense level of 25.

At sentencing, Brown argued that the cocaine base he acquired for personal use should not be counted against him for Guideline purposes, because he pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute. The government argued that Brown had furthered the conspiracy even when he purchased drugs for himself as a user. The court concluded that cocaine base Brown bought for his personal use should be counted as part of the drug quantity for which he was held responsible. After a concession by the government, the court determined that $1505 represented the total price of all the cocaine transactions Brown had described during his debriefing. Brown did not dispute that that was the total dollar amount, but he argued the amounts he had reported were simply estimates. He also argued that, because one gram of cocaine base cost $295 rather than the government's estimated $200, the drug quantities calculated from his dollar estimates were too high.

The court determined that 5.86 grams of cocaine base should be attributed to Brown. The court explained that 5.86 grams was a conservative amount, because the probation officer had used the lowest figures in the ranges Brown had described during his debriefing, and the court had used Brown's $295 average price per gram. In addition, the court granted Brown a two-level minor-participant reduction, given the size of the Fort Dodge conspiracy. The court determined a total...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • U.S. v. Fregoso, s. 94-2959
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • July 27, 1995
    ...acquired for his personal use had no relationship to the conspiracy. As Brown acknowledges, we rejected this argument in United States v. Brown, 19 F.3d 1246 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 100, 130 L.Ed.2d 49 (1994), holding that "the district court did not err by includ......
  • U.S. v. Apker, 8:90CR127-1.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Nebraska
    • November 5, 2002
    ...offense, the court shall approximate the quantity of the controlled substance." U.S.S.G. § 2D1.4, comment. (n.2); United States v. Brown, 19 F.3d 1246, 1248 (8th Cir.1994). Although the government bears the burden of establishing quantity, the court can rely upon an estimate of drug quantit......
  • United States v. Lewis
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • September 30, 2020
    ...the scale of the offense." United States v. Shaw , 965 F.3d 921, 927 (8th Cir. 2020) (cleaned up). See also United States v. Brown , 19 F.3d 1246, 1248 (8th Cir. 1994). "In so doing, the court may make a specific numeric determination of quantity based on imprecise evidence and without rega......
  • U.S. v. Pugh
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • May 31, 1994
    ...the quantity of the controlled substance." U.S.S.G. Sec. 2D1.1, comment. (n. 12) (emphasis added); see also United States v. Brown, 19 F.3d 1246, 1248 (8th Cir.1994). Here, the average weight of 0.1 grams per rock was an appropriate approximation given the actual weight of two samples of cr......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT