U.S. v. Chagra, No. 80-1377
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | Before INGRAHAM and TATE; INGRAHAM |
| Citation | 669 F.2d 241 |
| Parties | 9 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1567 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jamiel Alexander CHAGRA, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Docket Number | No. 80-1377 |
| Decision Date | 03 March 1982 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
113 practice notes
-
United States v. Sandoval, No. 18-1993
...an impartial jury,'" United States v. McNeill, 728 F.2d 5, 9 (1st Cir. 1984) (alterations in original) (quoting United States v. Chagra, 669 F.2d 241, 250 (5th Cir. 1982)),4 none of the casesPage 20 these defendants cite establishes that the presumption of prejudice must (or even may) be ap......
-
United States v. Chagra, No. SA-82-CR-57(4).
...v. Perry, 417 U.S. 21, 94 S.Ct. 2098, 40 L.Ed.2d 628 (1974); United States v. Cole, 755 F.2d 748 (11th Cir.1985); United States v. Chagra, 669 F.2d 241 (5th Cir.), reh'g denied, 673 F.2d 1321, cert. denied, 459 U.S. 846, 103 S.Ct. 102, 74 L.Ed.2d 92 The constitutional authority to "take car......
-
U.S. v. Darby, No. 82-5840
...they totalled $130,000. Citing Jeffers v. United States, 432 U.S. 137, 97 S.Ct. 2207, 53 L.Ed.2d 168 (1977) and United States v. Chagra, 669 F.2d 241 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 846, 103 S.Ct. 102, 74 L.Ed.2d 92 (1982), appellants maintain that a fine for engaging in a continuing cri......
-
State v. Thompson, No. 2010–1373.
...voir dire, were sufficient to " ‘reasonabl[y] assur[e] that prejudice would be discovered if present.’ " United States v. Chagra, 669 F.2d 241, 250 (5th Cir.1982), quoting United States v. Nell, 526 F.2d 1223, 1229 (5th Cir.1976). Prospective jurors had repeated opportunities, even 141 Ohio......
Request a trial to view additional results
112 cases
-
United States v. Sandoval, No. 18-1993
...an impartial jury,'" United States v. McNeill, 728 F.2d 5, 9 (1st Cir. 1984) (alterations in original) (quoting United States v. Chagra, 669 F.2d 241, 250 (5th Cir. 1982)),4 none of the casesPage 20 these defendants cite establishes that the presumption of prejudice must (or even may) be ap......
-
United States v. Chagra, No. SA-82-CR-57(4).
...v. Perry, 417 U.S. 21, 94 S.Ct. 2098, 40 L.Ed.2d 628 (1974); United States v. Cole, 755 F.2d 748 (11th Cir.1985); United States v. Chagra, 669 F.2d 241 (5th Cir.), reh'g denied, 673 F.2d 1321, cert. denied, 459 U.S. 846, 103 S.Ct. 102, 74 L.Ed.2d 92 The constitutional authority to "take car......
-
U.S. v. Darby, No. 82-5840
...they totalled $130,000. Citing Jeffers v. United States, 432 U.S. 137, 97 S.Ct. 2207, 53 L.Ed.2d 168 (1977) and United States v. Chagra, 669 F.2d 241 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 846, 103 S.Ct. 102, 74 L.Ed.2d 92 (1982), appellants maintain that a fine for engaging in a continuing cri......
-
State v. Thompson, No. 2010–1373.
...voir dire, were sufficient to " ‘reasonabl[y] assur[e] that prejudice would be discovered if present.’ " United States v. Chagra, 669 F.2d 241, 250 (5th Cir.1982), quoting United States v. Nell, 526 F.2d 1223, 1229 (5th Cir.1976). Prospective jurors had repeated opportunities, even 141 Ohio......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Two Rights Collide: Determining When Attorney-Client Privilege Should Yield to a Defendant’s Right to Compulsory Process or Confrontation
...to any legitimate evidentiary or procedural pur-pose” the evidentiary rule served.80 70. Id. 71. See United States v. Chagra, 669 F.2d 241, 260 (5th Cir. 1982) (“[T]he clause was designed to ensure that a defendant would have the subpoena power available for his defense rather than to guara......