U.S. v. Chung

Decision Date16 July 2009
Docket NumberCase No.: SACR08-00024-CJC.
CourtU.S. District Court — Central District of California
PartiesUNITED STATES of America Plaintiff, v. Dongfan "Greg" CHUNG Defendant.

Gregory W. Staples, AUSA, Ivy A. Wang, AUSA, Santa Ana, CA, for Plaintiff.

Thomas H. Bienert, Jr., Ariana Seldman Hawbecker, and Kenneth M. Miller, Bienert, Miller, Weitzel & Katzman, San Clemente, CA, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

CORMAC J. CARNEY, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The United States of America (the "Government") charged Defendant Dongfan "Greg" Chung with one count of acting as a foreign agent, one count of conspiring to violate the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 ("EEA"), six counts of violating the EEA, one count of making a false statement to the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI"), and one count of obstructing justice. After conducting a ten-day bench trial in this matter, the Court finds Mr. Chung guilty on all counts except for the count of obstructing justice.

Mr. Chung has been an agent of the People's Republic of China ("PRC") for over thirty years. Under the direction and control of the PRC, Mr. Chung misappropriated sensitive aerospace and military information belonging to his employer, The Boeing Company ("Boeing"), to assist the PRC in developing its own programs. To accomplish his mission, Mr. Chung kept over 300,000 pages of documents reflecting Boeing's trade secret and proprietary information in his home. Mr. Chung sent information that he misappropriated to the PRC through the mail, sea freight, a Chinese agent named Chi Mak, and even the Chinese consulate. On several occasions, Mr. Chung also used the information that he misappropriated from Boeing to prepare detailed briefings that he later presented to Chinese officials in the PRC. The trust Boeing placed in Mr. Chung to safeguard its proprietary and trade secret information obviously meant very little to Mr. Chung. He cast it aside to serve the PRC, which he proudly proclaimed as his "motherland." The Court now must hold Mr. Chung accountable for his crimes.

II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Mr. Chung, a naturalized United States citizen, worked as an engineer for his entire adult life. Ex. 219-54. At the beginning of his career, Boeing hired him as a stress analyst on the airframe and rotor hub for the CH-47 helicopter. Ex. 302-12. In 1969, Mr. Chung moved to another company, McDonnell Douglas, where he worked as a strength engineer on the wing structure of the DC-10 airliner and on the wing and armament support for the F-15 fighter.1 Id. In 1972 and part of 1973, Mr. Chung returned to Boeing and worked at its facility in Wichita, Kansas on the B-52 Life Extension Program. Id. In the fall of 1973, Mr. Chung moved to Rockwell International ("Rockwell") in Downey, California and worked there for the next twenty-six years. Boeing acquired Rockwell's space division in 1996. In 1999, Mr. Chung moved to Boeing's plant in Huntington Beach. For most of his career at Rockwell and Boeing, Mr. Chung worked as a stress analyst on the forward fuselage section of the Space Shuttle. Mr. Chung held a secret clearance2 from 1973 until 2002. Ex. 302-11.

In 2002, Boeing moved parts of its Space Shuttle program to Houston, Texas. Mr. Chung declined to move, and Boeing laid him off in September 2002. After the crash of the Columbia orbiter in February 2003, however, Mr. Chung came back to Boeing as a contractor to assist in the evaluation of the crash. He remained at Boeing until September 11, 2006.

Federal agents first suspected that Mr. Chung was spying for the PRC during its 2005 investigation of another engineer named Chi Mak, who worked for a naval defense contractor. Mr. Chung had significant contact with Chi Mak over the years, and the federal agents were concerned that their relationship was more than purely social. Federal agents knew that Chi Mak was using his position and security clearance to pass sensitive naval technology to the PRC. In 2007, a jury convicted Chi Mak of conspiring to export defense articles, attempting to export defense articles, acting as an unregistered agent of a foreign government, and making a false statement. This Court sentenced Chi Mak to approximately twenty-four years in prison for his crimes.

During a search of Chi Mak's home in October 2005, federal agents found address books containing contact information for Mr. Chung. Exs. 353-355. As part of the investigation in the Chi Mak case, Mr. Chung was interviewed on April 24, 2006. Mr. Chung told federal agents he first met Chi Mak in 1992 through a mutual friend "Mr. Gu" (later identified as Gu Weihao of the Chinese Ministry of Aviation), whom he described as an exchange scholar from China. In June 2006, during a second search of Chi Mak's home, federal agents discovered letters to Mr. Chung from Gu Weihao. In one letter, dated May 2, 1987, Gu Weihao asked Mr. Chung to provide information on airplanes and the Space Shuttle and referred to information that Mr. Chung had previously provided to the PRC. Ex. 359.

Following the discovery of the letter to Mr. Chung from Gu Weihao, federal agents conducted surveillance and trash searches at Mr. Chung's home. In August and September 2006, federal agents discovered that Mr. Chung had disposed of technical documents taken from work by secreting them within the pages of newspapers. Tr. 47:14-19, 50:6-8, 54:19-55:22, 63:19-24, 68:9-14, June 2, 2009. The documents included design drawings and diagrams, structural and material specifications, project management data, and engineering modification reports for the Space Shuttle and the International Space Station. Exs. 170-173.

Based on the information found in Mr. Chung's trash, federal agents believed that it was necessary to take a closer look at him and his activities. On September 11, 2006, federal agents interviewed Mr. Chung and searched his home.3 Federal agents were astonished at what they found. Mr. Chung had over 300,000 pages of sensitive and proprietary documents belonging to Boeing. More specifically, federal agents found a veritable treasure trove of Boeing's documents relating to the Space Shuttle, Delta IV Rocket, F-15 fighter, B-52 bomber, CH-46/47 Chinook helicopter, and other proprietary aerospace and military technologies. Federal agents also found numerous letters, tasking lists, and journals detailing Mr. Chung's communications with officials in the PRC. As federal agents sifted through the hundreds of thousands of pages of documents in Mr. Chung's home, the story of Mr. Chung's secret life became clear. He was a spy for the PRC.

The Government presented the evidence that federal agents collected against Mr. Chung to the grand jury, and on February 6, 2008, the grand jury returned an indictment against Mr. Chung. The grand jury charged Mr. Chung with one count of acting as a foreign agent, one count of conspiring to violate the EEA, six counts of violating the EEA, one count of making a false statement to the FBI, and one count of obstructing justice. Mr. Chung waived his right to a jury, and the Court conducted a ten-day bench trial. This memorandum sets forth the Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law.

III. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
A. Foreign Agent

Mr. Chung is charged with acting as a foreign agent pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 951, which provides, in pertinent part:

(a) Whoever, other than a diplomatic or consular officer or attaché, acts in the United States as an agent of a foreign government without prior notification to the Attorney General if required in subsection (b), shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(d) For purposes of this section, the term "agent of a foreign government" means an individual who agrees to operate within the United States subject to the direction or control of a foreign government or official....

18 U.S.C. § 951.

To show that Mr. Chung is guilty of acting as a foreign agent, the Government must prove that: (1) Mr. Chung acted in the United States as an agent of the PRC; (2) Mr. Chung failed to notify the Attorney General of the United States that he would be acting in the United States as an agent of the PRC prior to so acting;4 and (3) Mr. Chung acted knowingly and knew that he had not provided prior notification to the Attorney General. The Government proved each of these elements beyond a reasonable doubt.

The extensive library that Mr. Chung maintained and concealed at his home is incredibly incriminating evidence of his service as a foreign agent for the PRC. This library was staggering in terms of its size and content. It contained over 300,000 pages of trade secret and proprietary information belonging to Boeing. For instance, Mr. Chung had over 700 documents related to the Shuttle Drawing System ("SDS"), a system that contains specifications created by Rockwell and Boeing engineers for performing processes related to all aspects of the Space Shuttle. Some SDS documents were found hidden in newspapers under stairs on the day of the search, and others were recovered from Mr. Chung's fireplace and garbage. On one of the SDS documents Mr. Chung wrote Chi Mak's name, in Chinese, as well as Chi Mak's work and home phone numbers. Ex. 19-3. In addition to the documents themselves, Mr. Chung created an index of the SDS documents on his home computer. Ex. 41.

The SDS was, and is, export-controlled. Tr. 129:10-15, June 5, 2009. Engineers must have a password and a need to know in order to access to the system. Id. 129:3-4. Mr. Chung signed an SDS access agreement in 2001 in which he confirmed that he understood that the SDS was export-controlled. Ex. 70.

Mr. Chung's library also consisted of other Space Shuttle-related documents, many of which contain export-controlled or proprietary information. These documents include detailed Space Shuttle structure diagrams, Space Shuttle specifications, as well as an organization chart...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • United States v. Hanjuan Jin
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • February 8, 2012
    ...of a trade secret. The district court in the Central District of California reached the same conclusion in United States v. Chung, 633 F.Supp.2d 1134 (C.D.Cal.2009). Noting that the Supreme Court “has long recognized a presumption in favor of an intent requirement for ‘the crucial element’ ......
  • United States v. O'Rourke
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • October 9, 2019
    ...secret." In support, O'Rourke points to United States v. Hanjuan Jin , 833 F. Supp. 2d 977 (N.D. Ill. 2012), and United States v. Chung , 633 F. Supp. 2d 1134 (C.D. Cal. 2009), both of which hold that the government must prove that defendants know the information they are taking is a trade ......
  • United States v. Hna Juan Jin
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • February 8, 2012
    ...of a trade secret. The district court in the Central District of California reached the same conclusion in United Slates v. Chung, 633 F. Supp. 2d 1134 (CD. Cal. 2009). Noting that the Supreme Court "has long recognized a presumption in favor of an intent requirement for 'the crucial elemen......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Series: Economic Espionage and Theft of Trade Secrets
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • February 24, 2022
    ...possessed was, in fact, a trade secret; and (5) [the defendant] knew the information was a trade secret.” United States v. Chung, 633 F. Supp. 2d 1134, 1146 (C.D. Cal. 2009). In 2009, Dongfan “Greg” Chung became the first person ever convicted by a jury for violations under § 1831 of the Ac......
3 books & journal articles
  • § 5.03 Analysis of the Act
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Intellectual Property and Computer Crimes Title Chapter 5 Economic Espionage and the Criminal Theft of Trade Secrets
    • Invalid date
    ...155 F.3d 189, 195-96 (3d Cir. 1998); United States v. Chung, 622 F. Supp. 2d 971 (C.D. Cal. 2009). But see, United States v. Chung, 633 F. Supp. 2d 1134, 1136 (C.D. Cal. 2009). ("The EEA's definition of trade secret is based on the definition provided in the Uniform Trade Secrets Act, which......
  • Intellectual property crimes.
    • United States
    • American Criminal Law Review Vol. 51 No. 4, September 2014
    • September 22, 2014
    ...v. Krumrei, 258 F.3d 535, 539 (6th Cir. 2001) (holding "reasonable measures" is not unconstitutionally vague); United States v. Chung, 633 F. Supp. 2d 1134, 1147 (C.D. Cal. 2009) (finding requirement of photo identification, right to search employees' cars and belongings, restriction of acc......
  • The "benefit" of spying: defining the boundaries of economic espionage under the Economic Espionage Act of 1996.
    • United States
    • Stanford Law Review Vol. 63 No. 2, January 2011
    • January 1, 2011
    ...China (Dec. 14, 2006), available at http://www.justice.gov/ criminal/cybercrime/yePlea.htm. (30.) United States v. Dongfan Chung, 633 F. Supp. 2d 1134, 1135 (C.D. Cal. 2009); Edvard Pettersson, Ex-Boeing Engineer Chung Guilty of Stealing Trade Secrets (Update3), BLOOMBERG NEWS, July 16, 200......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT