U.S. v. Clark
| Decision Date | 21 October 2004 |
| Docket Number | No. 03-60693 Summary Calendar.,03-60693 Summary Calendar. |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Howell CLARK, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Sandra G. Moses, Jackson, MS, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Nathan Henry Elmore, Jackson, MS, for Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi.
Before GARZA, DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
John Howell Clark pleaded guilty to one charge of conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. This charge arose from Clark's participation in a scheme in which several individuals, including Clark, visited physicians and obtained prescriptions for controlled substances. Joe Callahan paid for these individuals' prescriptions in exchange for a share of their drugs, which he then unlawfully distributed to others.
Clark objected to the presentence report and argued that the probation officer had erroneously calculated the amount of drugs that was attributable to him for sentencing purposes. He contended that some of the pills that he obtained were for his personal consumption, and he argued that these pills should not be used to calculate his sentence because they were not part of the conspiracy. The district court overruled this objection and sentenced Clark to 18 months in prison and a three-year term of supervised release.
Clark now appeals his sentence. He contends that the district court erred at sentencing by using the drugs that were for his personal consumption to calculate his base offense level.
This court reviews a district court's legal interpretation of the Sentencing Guidelines de novo. United States v. Lowder, 148 F.3d 548, 552 (5th Cir.1998). A district court's findings of fact, including its findings concerning the amount of drugs for which a defendant should be held responsible, are reviewed for clear error. Id.; United States v. Posada-Rios, 158 F.3d 832, 878 (5th Cir.1998).
This court has not yet addressed whether the drug quantity calculation used to determine the base offense level for a conviction of conspiracy to distribute should include drugs a defendant possessed for his personal consumption. However, every other circuit that has considered this issue has held that a district court properly considers the amount of drugs intended for a defendant's personal consumption when calculating the sentence for a conviction involving a drug conspiracy. See United States v. Page, 232 F.3d 536, 542 (6th Cir.2000); United States v....
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
United States v. Williamson
...of conspiring-to-distribute a controlled substance. United States v. Iglesias , 535 F.3d 150, 160 (3d Cir. 2008) ; United States v. Clark , 389 F.3d 141, 142 (5th Cir. 2004) ; United States v. Page , 232 F.3d 536, 542 (6th Cir. 2000) ; United States v. Asch , 207 F.3d 1238, 1243-44 (10th Ci......
-
United States v. Kearby
...distribution unlawful, not purchases." But he properly concedes that our precedent forecloses that claim. E.g. , United States v. Clark , 389 F.3d 141, 142 (5th Cir. 2004) (per curiam). Accordingly, Kearby has failed to show plain or clear error in the calculation of quantity.B. Kearby chal......
-
United States v. Sutton
...consider amounts of drugs for personal use when calculating a defendant's base offense level in a drug conspiracy case. 389 F.3d 141, 142 (5th Cir. 2004) (per curiam). contention that Clark has been overruled "sub silentio" is unpersuasive. [6] Notably, in connection with her guilty plea, S......
-
United States v. Eustice
...de novo and its findings of fact, including the calculation of drugs attributable to Eustice, for clear error. United States v. Clark , 389 F.3d 141, 142 (5th Cir. 2004). The calculation will be upheld so long as it is "plausible in light of the record as a whole." United States v. Betancou......