U.S. v. Cook, 94-3106

• Decision Date: 13 September 1985
• Docket Number: No. 94-3106,94-3106
• Citation: 70 F.3d 638
• Parties: NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Darrick COOK, Appellant.
• Court: U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit

Page 638

70 F.3d 638

315 U.S.App.D.C. 77

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Darrick COOK, Appellant.

No. 94-3106.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Sept. 13, 1985.

Before: WILLIAMS, GINSBURG and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and oral arguments of counsel. After full review, the court is satisfied that appropriate disposition of the appeal does not warrant an opinion. See D.C.Cir.Rule 36(b). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by this court that the judgment of the district court be affirmed.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 41(a)(1). This instruction to the Clerk is without prejudice to the right of any party at any time to move for expedited issuance of the mandate for good cause shown.