U.S. v. Crocker Nat. Corp., s. 76-3614
Decision Date | 13 September 1983 |
Docket Number | 76-3615,76-3692 and 76-3738,Nos. 76-3614,s. 76-3614 |
Citation | 715 F.2d 1363 |
Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Cross-Appellee, v. CROCKER NATIONAL CORP., et al., Defendants-Cross-Appellants. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CROCKER NATIONAL CORP., et al., Defendants-Appellees. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Cross-Appellee, v. BANKAMERICA CORPORATION, et al., Defendants-Cross-Appellants. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANKAMERICA CORPORATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Robert Raven, Morrison & Foerster, San Francisco, Cal., for Crocker bank.
J. Randolph Wilson, Covington & Burling, Washington, D.C., for Equitable Life Assurance Soc., etc.
Catherine G. O'Sullivan, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for USA.
William Simon, Howrey & Simon, Washington, D.C., for Prudential Ins.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, KENNEDY, Circuit Judge, and CHRISTENSEN, * District Judge.
Pursuant to the order of the Supreme Court of the United States, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 2266, 76 L.Ed.2d 456, dated June 8, 1983 reversing the judgment of this court, 656 F.2d 428, in the above cases and remanding the cause to this court, the above cases are remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States.
* Honorable Sherman A. Christensen, Senior Judge, United States District Court for the District of Utah, sitting by designation.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
U.S. v. Von Stoll
... ... that Chester transferred $10,000 to him at the Crocker Bank in San Francisco. The government produced a record of ... That is what the Supreme Court has told us in Stirone: ... [However,] when only one particular kind of ... ...
-
U.S. v. Wellington
... ... allegations constituted an amendment is properly before us ... 2 The sufficiency of an indictment is reviewable de ... ...