U.S. v. DeMaise

Decision Date27 August 1984
Citation745 F.2d 49
PartiesU.S. v. DeMaise 83-1821
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit

E.D.Pa.,

Troutman, J.,

560 F.Supp. 1309

AFFIRMED

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • U.S. v. Williams, s. 96-3629
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • August 26, 1997
    ... ... That question is not before us, but we mention it to make clear that in declining to hold television surveillance unconstitutional per se we do not suggest that the Constitution ... ...
  • Perry v. State
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • December 10, 1999
    ...1047 (D.P.R.1982));United States v. Geller, 560 F.Supp. 1309, 1317 (E.D.Pa.1983) (discussing Bennett), aff'd sub nom. United States v. DeMaise, 745 F.2d 49 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1109,105 S.Ct. 786, 83 L.Ed.2d 780 (1985); see Echols v. State, 484 So.2d 568, 571-72 (Fla.1985) ......
  • Com. v. Schaeffer
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Superior Court
    • December 29, 1987
    ...404 (1987)); see also United States v. Geller, 560 F.Supp. 1309, 1313 n. 2 (E.D.Pa.1983), aff'd per curiam sub nom. United States v. DeMaise, 745 F.2d 49 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1109, 105 S.Ct. 786, 83 L.Ed.2d 780 Our ruling that the police need a warrant to conduct one-party ......
  • Hulit v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • December 16, 1998
    ...v. California, PruneYard Shopping Ctr. v. Robins, Oregon v. Hass & Davis v. Bd. Of Medical Examiners ), aff'd sub nom. United States v. DeMaise, 745 F.2d 49 (3rd Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1109, 105 S.Ct. 786, 83 L.Ed.2d 780 (1985); Bower v. State, 769 S.W.2d 887, 903 (Tex.Crim.App.1......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT