U.S. v. DeMaise
Decision Date | 27 August 1984 |
Citation | 745 F.2d 49 |
Parties | U.S. v. DeMaise 83-1821 |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit |
To continue reading
Request your trial16 cases
-
U.S. v. Williams, s. 96-3629
... ... That question is not before us, but we mention it to make clear that in declining to hold television surveillance unconstitutional per se we do not suggest that the Constitution ... ...
-
Perry v. State
...1047 (D.P.R.1982));United States v. Geller, 560 F.Supp. 1309, 1317 (E.D.Pa.1983) (discussing Bennett), aff'd sub nom. United States v. DeMaise, 745 F.2d 49 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1109,105 S.Ct. 786, 83 L.Ed.2d 780 (1985); see Echols v. State, 484 So.2d 568, 571-72 (Fla.1985) ......
-
Com. v. Schaeffer
...404 (1987)); see also United States v. Geller, 560 F.Supp. 1309, 1313 n. 2 (E.D.Pa.1983), aff'd per curiam sub nom. United States v. DeMaise, 745 F.2d 49 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1109, 105 S.Ct. 786, 83 L.Ed.2d 780 Our ruling that the police need a warrant to conduct one-party ......
-
Hulit v. State
...v. California, PruneYard Shopping Ctr. v. Robins, Oregon v. Hass & Davis v. Bd. Of Medical Examiners ), aff'd sub nom. United States v. DeMaise, 745 F.2d 49 (3rd Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1109, 105 S.Ct. 786, 83 L.Ed.2d 780 (1985); Bower v. State, 769 S.W.2d 887, 903 (Tex.Crim.App.1......
Request a trial to view additional results