U.S. v. Downs, No. 88-7458

CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (11th Circuit)
Writing for the CourtBefore HILL, HATCHETT and CLARK; PER CURIAM
Citation870 F.2d 613
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terry DOWNS, Defendant-Appellant. Non-Argument Calendar.
Decision Date19 April 1989
Docket NumberNo. 88-7458

Page 613

870 F.2d 613
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Terry DOWNS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 88-7458
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
April 19, 1989.

Page 614

Danny L. Lowrey, Corinth, Miss., for defendant-appellant.

J.B. Sessions, III, U.S. Atty., William H. Steele, Asst. U.S. Atty., Mobile, Ala., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama.

Before HILL, HATCHETT and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The appellant, Terry Downs, pled guilty to the commission of mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1341. On appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction. Finding sufficient evidence, we affirm.

I

The government and the appellant stipulated to the following facts: Terry Downs, a resident of Booneville, Mississippi, operated a business buying and selling used automobiles. Between 1985 and 1986, the appellant purchased approximately sixty used automobiles in Texas and resold them to McConnell Cadillac ("McConnell"), a dealership in Mobile, Alabama. In several of these automobiles, Terry Downs rolled back the odometers and falsified the vehicles' odometer statements. For example, in May, 1986, the appellant purchased a 1984 Ford automobile in Texas which had been driven 62,718 miles. He rolled back the odometer to indicate 38,464 miles, and then sold the automobile to McConnell for $6,300--a price reflecting the value of that car at 38,464 miles. The appellant asserts in the stipulation that he altered the odometers at the request of Charlie Harris, a McConnell employee. Harris asserts, however, that he made no such request.

In every transaction, McConnell paid for each automobile with a sight draft. The appellant transferred the sight draft, as well as the automobile's title, bill of sale, and odometer statement to his brother, Larry Downs, who had financed the purchase and resale of the used cars. Larry Downs paid the appellant the profit on each automobile sale and delivered the documents to his bank in Booneville, Mississippi. That bank credited Larry Downs' account and mailed the automobile documents with the draft through the United States postal system to McConnell's bank in Mobile. There, a McConnell representative inspected the automobile documents and approved payment of the sight drafts. McConnell then resold the vehicles in reliance upon the odometer statements. After...

To continue reading

Request your trial
22 practice notes
  • In re Managed Care Litigation, No. MDL 1334.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. Southern District of Florida
    • 12 Junio 2001
    ...in a scheme to defraud another of money or property and (2) uses the mails or wires in furtherance of that scheme. United States v. Downs, 870 F.2d 613, 615 (11th Cir. 1989). A "scheme to defraud" entails the making of misrepresentations intended and reasonably calculated to deceive persons......
  • In re Managed Care Litigation, MDL No. 1334.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. Southern District of Florida
    • 2 Marzo 2001
    ...in a scheme to defraud another of money or property and (2) uses the mails or wires in furtherance of that scheme. United States v. Downs, 870 F.2d 613, 615 (11th Cir. 1989). A "scheme to defraud" entails the making of misrepresentations intended and reasonably calculated to deceive persons......
  • Marshall v. City of Atlanta, Civ. A. No. 1:95-CV-1595-JOF.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. Northern District of Georgia
    • 29 Marzo 1996
    ...intentionally participated in a scheme to defraud and that the mails were used in furtherance of said scheme. United States v. Downs, 870 F.2d 613, 615 (11th Cir.1989). The focus is on the deceptive activity and it is not necessary that the documents actually being transported contain fraud......
  • In re Sahlen & Associates, Inc. Securities Lit., No. 89-6308-CIV-WMH.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. Southern District of Florida
    • 10 Julio 1991
    ...participated in a scheme to defraud him of his property, and (2) used the mails in furtherance of that scheme. U.S. v. Downs, 870 F.2d 613, 615 (11th Cir.1989). Similarly, in order to state a claim for wire fraud, a plaintiff must allege (1) a scheme to defraud, and (2) the use of an inters......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
22 cases
  • In re Managed Care Litigation, No. MDL 1334.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. Southern District of Florida
    • 12 Junio 2001
    ...in a scheme to defraud another of money or property and (2) uses the mails or wires in furtherance of that scheme. United States v. Downs, 870 F.2d 613, 615 (11th Cir. 1989). A "scheme to defraud" entails the making of misrepresentations intended and reasonably calculated to deceive persons......
  • In re Managed Care Litigation, MDL No. 1334.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. Southern District of Florida
    • 2 Marzo 2001
    ...in a scheme to defraud another of money or property and (2) uses the mails or wires in furtherance of that scheme. United States v. Downs, 870 F.2d 613, 615 (11th Cir. 1989). A "scheme to defraud" entails the making of misrepresentations intended and reasonably calculated to deceive persons......
  • Marshall v. City of Atlanta, Civ. A. No. 1:95-CV-1595-JOF.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. Northern District of Georgia
    • 29 Marzo 1996
    ...intentionally participated in a scheme to defraud and that the mails were used in furtherance of said scheme. United States v. Downs, 870 F.2d 613, 615 (11th Cir.1989). The focus is on the deceptive activity and it is not necessary that the documents actually being transported contain fraud......
  • In re Sahlen & Associates, Inc. Securities Lit., No. 89-6308-CIV-WMH.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. Southern District of Florida
    • 10 Julio 1991
    ...participated in a scheme to defraud him of his property, and (2) used the mails in furtherance of that scheme. U.S. v. Downs, 870 F.2d 613, 615 (11th Cir.1989). Similarly, in order to state a claim for wire fraud, a plaintiff must allege (1) a scheme to defraud, and (2) the use of an inters......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT