U.S. v. Dunn, 81-1200
Decision Date | 17 January 1986 |
Docket Number | No. 81-1200,81-1200 |
Citation | 781 F.2d 52 |
Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald Dale DUNN and Robert Lyle Carpenter, Defendants-Appellants. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Louis Dugas, Jr., Orange, Tex., for Dunn.
Charles T. Newlin, John F. Hirling, Stephen Shelnutt, Houston, Tex., for Carpenter.
Robert Lyle Carpenter, Houston, pro se.
Helen M. Eversberg, U.S. Atty., Sidney Powell, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., Ann T. Wallace, Atty., Appellate Section, Crim.Div., D. of J., Washington, D.C., for U.S.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas; Robert Madden Hill, Judge, sitting by designation.
Before WISDOM, POLITZ and TATE, Circuit Judges.
IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of this Court, 766 F.2d 880, entered on July 16, 1985 and issued as mandate on November 26, 1985 is recalled and vacated. The Court will enter a new judgment in this cause in due course.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
United States v. Dunn, 85-998
...the Court of Appeals recalled and vacated its judgment issued on remand, stating that it would enter a new judgment in due course. 781 F.2d 52. On February 4, 1986, the Court of Appeals reinstated the original opinion rendered in 1982, asserting that "[u]pon studied reflection, we now concl......
-
Reich v. Beharry
... ... 's challenged decision deprived Reich of a protectible property interest, 2 it is unnecessary for us to undertake this difficult task of line-drawing. Assuming, without deciding, that Beharry did ... ...
- Van de Zilver v. Rutgers University
-
Keles v. Bender
... ... sufficient process before dismissing him. Before us, Keles ... argues that the District Court erred, contending that ... Rutgers's ... ...
-
Due Process Roulette: Why Public University Students Are Not Guaranteed Procedural Due Process When Facing Suspension or Dismissal
...resemblance to the fundamental interests that previously have been viewed as implicitly protected by the Constitution'"). [131]Mauriello, 781 F.2d at 52 (dismissing the plaintiff's procedural due process [132]Dixon, 294 F.2d at 157. [133] 294 F.2d 150 (5th Cir. 1961). [134]Id. at 152. The p......