U.S. v. Frezzo Bros., Inc., 82-1494
| Decision Date | 29 March 1983 |
| Docket Number | No. 82-1494,82-1494 |
| Citation | 703 F.2d 62 |
| Parties | , 13 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,584 UNITED STATES of America v. FREZZO BROTHERS, INC., Guido Frezzo, and James L. Frezzo, Appellants. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit |
John Rogers Carroll (argued), Carroll & Carroll, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellants.
Bruce J. Chasan, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SLOVITER and VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judges.
In 1978, a jury convicted appellants of six counts of willfully and negligently discharging pollutants into waterways of the United States in violation of 33 U.S.C. Secs. 1311(a) and 1319(c) (1978). See United States v. Frezzo Bros., Inc., 461 F.Supp. 266 (E.D.Pa.1978). This court affirmed the convictions. United States v. Frezzo Bros., Inc., 602 F.2d 1123 (3d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1074, 100 S.Ct. 1020, 62 L.Ed.2d 756 (1980). The district court dismissed petitions for post-conviction relief, under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255, United States v. Frezzo Bros., Inc., 491 F.Supp. 1339 (E.D.Pa.1980), but this court reversed and remanded for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether appellants' conduct was exempted from the criminal sanctions of 33 U.S.C. Secs. 1311(a) and 1319(c) as agricultural activity under 40 C.F.R. Sec. 125.4(i) (1978). United States v. Frezzo Bros., Inc., 642 F.2d 59 (3d Cir.1981).
The district court found that petitioners' conduct was not agricultural activity; rather, the court found that petitioners' conduct was manufacturing in nature. United States v. Frezzo Bros., Inc., 546 F.Supp. 713 (E.D.Pa.1982). Consequently, it held that the pollution that resulted from petitioners' conduct was not exempted by 40 C.F.R. Sec. 125.4(i) from the criminal sanctions under which they were convicted, 33 U.S.C. Secs. 1311(a) and 1319(c). It therefore denied petitioners' request for collateral relief. Petitioners now oppose the district court's decision.
After considering the contentions raised by appellants, to-wit, that (1) the district court erred in interpreting the Environmental Protection Agency's agricultural exclusion regulations, (2) the district court entirely ignored the evidence of record in determining that petitioners' mushroom composting operation was manufacturing rather than agriculture, (3) the government is estopped from arguing and the district court is estopped from finding that petitioners' mushroom composting operation is manufacturing, (4) that the definition...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
U.S. v. Plaza Health Laboratories, Inc.
...is not agriculture, so exception for agricultural point sources not applicable to pipe carrying stormwater runoff), aff'd, 703 F.2d 62 (3d Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 829, 104 S.Ct. 106, 78 L.Ed.2d 109 Further, the legislative history indicates that the Act was meant to contr......
-
U.S. v. Weitzenhoff
...Inc., 934 F.2d 599, 618-19 & n. 32 (5th Cir.1991); United States v. Frezzo Bros., Inc., 546 F.Supp. 713, 720-21 (E.D.Pa.1982), aff'd, 703 F.2d 62 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 829, 104 S.Ct. 106, 78 L.Ed.2d 109 (1983).5 Weitzenhoff argues that this case is controlled by United States v.......
-
Concerned Area Residents v. Southview Farm
...F.Supp. 713 (E.D.Pa.1982) (discharge of compost made partially from chicken manure for use in growing mushrooms violated CWA), aff'd, 703 F.2d 62 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 829, 104 S.Ct. 106, 78 L.Ed.2d 109 Furthermore, aside from these cases, the regulations relied upon by defendan......
-
United States v. Frezzo, Crim. No. 83-00029-1.
...642 F.2d 59 (3d Cir.1981). On remand, this Court again denied relief, 546 F.Supp. 713 (Pa.1982), and this denial was affirmed 703 F.2d 62 (3d Cir. 1983). ...
-
General Principles of Criminal Liability
...What is meant by the term “knowingly” has thus become the most frequently litigated issue in 6. See discussion infra Sections D & E. 7. 703 F.2d 62, 13 ELR 20584 (3d Cir. 1983). 8. United States v. Baytank (Houston), Inc., 934 F.2d 599, 618-19 (5th Cir. 1991), reached the same conclusion, i......
-
Fault lines in the Clean Water Act: criminal enforcement, continuing violations, and mental state.
...discharges"); United States v. Frezzo Bros., Inc., 546 F. Supp. 713, 717-20 (E.D. Pa. 1982) (discussing agricultural exemption), aff'd, 703 F.2d 62, 63 (3d Cir. 1983); United States v. Frezzo Bros., Inc., 491 F. Supp. 1339, 1341-42 (E.D. Pa. 1980) (discussing agricultural exemption); United......