U.S. v. Gibbs, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | Karen Nelson Moore |
| Citation | 182 F.3d 408 |
| Decision Date | 27 January 1999 |
| Docket Number | DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS,PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,Nos. 96-3383 |
| Parties | (6th Cir. 1999) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,, v. ANTHONY GIBBS (96-3383); RICHARD HOUGH (96-3384); DONNETO BERRY (96-3385); CHAD GIBBS (96-3386); ROBERT CURTIS (96-3387); LAMONT NEEDUM (96-3388); ANTWAN WOODS (96-3402),to 96-3388, 96-3402 Argued: |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
229 practice notes
-
U.S. v. Ostrander, No. 04-1157.
...engaged in a drug trafficking offense at the moment they killed Andrews. To bolster this argument, Appellants cite United States v. Gibbs, 182 F.3d 408 (6th Cir.1999). In Gibbs, the defendant sold crack to an undercover agent. The agent left defendant and returned to his car. At that point,......
-
United States v. Young, Nos. 14-6081/14-6451/15-5045/15-5738
...of the object of the conspiracy and that he voluntarily associated himself with it to further its objectives." United States v. Gibbs , 182 F.3d 408, 421 (6th Cir. 1999) (quoting United States v. Hodges , 935 F.2d 766, 772 (6th Cir. 1991) ). "A buyer/seller relationship alone is not enough ......
-
United States v. Honeycutt, Nos. 14–5790
...and (3) participation in the conspiracy.’ " United States v. Pritchett, 749 F.3d 417, 431 (6th Cir.2014) (quoting United States v. Gibbs, 182 F.3d 408, 420 (6th Cir.1999) ). Here, the Government presented ample evidence for a rational juror to convict Honeycutt of conspiracy to violate §§ 8......
-
People v. Bell, Docket No. 233234.
...errors relating to the right to remove jurors peremptorily are not subject to harmless error analysis. See, e.g., United States v. Gibbs, 182 F.3d 408, 435 (C.A.6, 1999) (denial of right to peremptory challenge "amounts to reversible error, there is no requirement of a showing of prejudice"......
Request a trial to view additional results
240 cases
-
U.S. v. Gabrion, Nos. 02–1386
...it “includes common-law rights and is broader than the protection provided in the Fifth and Sixth Amendments.” United States v. Gibbs, 182 F.3d 408, 436 (6th Cir.1999). In camera conferences are a stage of the trial within the meaning of Rule 43. United States v. Brown, 571 F.2d 980, 986 (6......
-
U.S. v. Lopez-Medina, No. 05-5891.
...a criminal. A jury may not infer membership in a conspiracy by mere association of individuals with one another. United States v. Gibbs, 182 F.3d 408, 423 (6th Cir.1999). Evidence of Jackson's criminal history was also irrelevant. This is so despite the evidence suggesting Jackson's involve......
-
U.S. v. Jamieson, No. 02-3403.
...himself with it to further its objectives.'" United States v. Crossley, 224 F.3d 847, 856 (6th Cir.2000) (quoting United States v. Gibbs, 182 F.3d 408, 421 (6th Cir.1999)). Mail fraud consists of (1) a scheme to defraud, and (2) use of the mails in furtherance of the scheme. See United Stat......
-
U.S. v. White, No. 05-3403.
...rights if it is likely to have had any substantial effect on his conviction." Whittington, 455 F.3d at 740 (citing United States v. Gibbs, 182 F.3d 408, 430 (6th Cir.1999)); see also United States v. Baldwin, 418 F.3d 575, 582 (6th Cir.2005) (quoting Mitchell v. Esparza, 540 U.S. 12, 17-18,......
Request a trial to view additional results