U.S. v. Goff, s. 81-1766

Decision Date23 July 1982
Docket Number81-1776,Nos. 81-1766,s. 81-1766
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth M. GOFF and Michael L. Jacobson, Defendants-Appellants.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

Stewart Riley, Seattle, Wash., for Goff.

Jon James Watson, Seattle, Wash., for Jacobson.

Francis J. Burke, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Seattle, Wash., for the U. S.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington.

Before WRIGHT, TANG, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.

EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:

We affirm the convictions of defendants for cocaine possession, finding that the district court correctly denied suppression of evidence obtained after a search of defendants pursuant to a search warrant.

The warrant, requested by a Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agent and issued by a magistrate in the Western District of Washington, was supported by an affidavit reciting the following facts.

An informant related to the DEA agent a conversation with defendant Jacobson. Jacobson indicated that he and a "Ken" were planning a trip from Seattle to Miami to purchase a large quantity of cocaine. At the Seattle-Tacoma airport, the informant identified both defendants, who were making arrangements under false names for a 36-hour round trip to Miami. Mr. Goff appeared to be wearing a money belt and Mr. Jacobson was wearing a loose-fitting shirt that could have concealed one.

Subsequent DEA investigation verified defendants' identities and disclosed that Jacobson previously had been involved in drug smuggling activities.

Defendants were followed and surveilled in Miami until airline personnel confirmed that they had boarded the nonstop return flight to Seattle. The affidavit further stated that airline personnel had confirmed that Goff and Jacobson had, hours before, boarded a direct flight from Miami to Seattle and that the flight was expected to arrive within hours.

The DEA agent in Seattle then requested the search warrant, which was issued during the flight. DEA agents confronted defendants soon after they disembarked from the airplane. The search was conducted at the airport and cocaine was recovered from both defendants.

Defendants' argument that the affidavit does not establish probable cause is without merit. The informant's information, corroborated by independent investigation, was enough to lead to a reasonable suspicion that unlawful activity was under way. United States v. Johnson, 641 F.2d 652, 659 (9th Cir. 1980).

The contention that the affidavit failed to establish the credibility of the undisclosed informant is unfounded. No recitation of credibility was necessary because the DEA's investigation corroborated the details described by the informant. See id. at 658; United States v. Lefkowitz, 618 F.2d 1313 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 824, 101 S.Ct. 86, 66 L.Ed.2d 27 (1980).

Defendants argue that the search warrant was invalid because the affidavit does not establish probable cause to believe that when the warrant was issued the contraband sought was in the Western District of Washington.

We do not interpret Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(a) to require that, in every circumstance, the evidence sought must be physically in existence within the district at the time the warrant issues. 1 Cf. Berger v. New York, 388 U.S. 41, 56-57, 87 S.Ct. 1873, 1882-1883, 18 L.Ed.2d 1040 (1967) (discussing the validity of an order authorizing the use of electronic devices to procure evidence when the order provided...

To continue reading

Request your trial
22 cases
  • U.S. v. Whitehead
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • 18 d1 Julho d1 1988
    ...could have applied in advance for a warrant in the jurisdiction through which the train is scheduled to travel. See United States v. Goff, 681 F.2d 1238, 1240 (9th Cir.1982). Indeed, the defendant was already under suspicion before he boarded the train in Miami. A federal law enforcement of......
  • United States v. Krueger
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • 10 d2 Novembro d2 2015
    ...I will come to in a moment). See United States v. $64,000.00 in U.S. Currency, 722 F.2d 239, 246 (5th Cir.1984) ; United States v. Goff, 681 F.2d 1238, 1240 n. 1 (9th Cir.1982). And the third, United States v. Berkos, 543 F.3d 392 (7th Cir.2008), found the magistrate judge had lawful author......
  • State v. Womack
    • United States
    • Utah Court of Appeals
    • 22 d4 Outubro d4 1998
    ...493 U.S. 943, 110 S.Ct. 348, 107 L.Ed.2d 336 (1989); United States v. Goodwin, 854 F.2d 33, 36 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Goff, 681 F.2d 1238, 1240 (9th Cir.1982); United States v. Lowe, 575 F.2d 1193, 1194 (6th Cir.1978); United States v. Garnett, 951 F.Supp. 657, 662 n. 7 (E.D.Mich.......
  • U.S. v. Ricciardelli
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • 5 d2 Janeiro d2 1993
    ...States v. Wylie, 919 F.2d 969, 974-75 (5th Cir.1990); United States v. Goodwin, 854 F.2d 33, 36 (4th Cir.1988); United States v. Goff, 681 F.2d 1238, 1240 (9th Cir.1982); United States v. Lowe, 575 F.2d 1193, 1194 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 869, 99 S.Ct. 198, 58 L.Ed.2d 180 (1978); ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT