U.S. v. Hamm

Decision Date23 April 1981
Docket NumberNos. 80-1315,80-1331,s. 80-1315
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert HAMM, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Willis Judge BUTLER, Les Wallick Fuller, Dayton Bud Evans, Jr. and Larry Dale Washington, Defendants-Appellants. . Unit A
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Joe J. Fisher, Judge.

Edward D. Foreman, Pros. Atty., Thomas E. Reynolds, St. Petersburg, Fla., for defendant-appellant.

William C. Bryson, Peter E. Scheer, Attys., Washington, D. C., for plaintiff-appellee.

Randy Schaffer, Houston, Tex., for Washington.

Melvyn C. Bruder, Dallas, Tex., for Butler & Evans (Fuller).

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion March 2, 1981, 5 Cir., 638 F.2d 823)

Before BROWN, COLEMAN, AINSWORTH, CHARLES CLARK, GEE, RUBIN, GARZA, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, TATE, SAM D. JOHNSON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A majority of the Judges in active service, on the Court's own motion, having determined to have this case reheard en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • U.S. v. Hamm
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • October 19, 1981
    ...the Government's motion to dismiss the indictments, 638 F.2d 823 (5th Cir. 1981). The court then voted to rehear the case en banc, 644 F.2d 354 (5th Cir. 1981), thus vacating the panel opinion. See Fifth Circuit Local Rule 17. On rehearing en banc, we again find that the district court shou......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT