U.S. v. Hammoud
| Decision Date | 02 August 2004 |
| Docket Number | No. 03-4253.,03-4253. |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mohamad Youssef HAMMOUD, a/k/a Ali Albousaleh, a/k/a Ali Abousaleh, Defendant-Appellant, Center for Constitutional Rights; National Coalition to Protect Political Freedom; National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers; National Lawyers Guild, Amici Supporting Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit |
After oral argument was heard by a panel of judges, a majority of the judges in active service voted to hear this appeal en banc. The en banc court heard argument on the matter on August 2, 2004.
According to the vote of a majority of the en banc court constituted to hear this appeal, we affirm the judgment and hold that Blakely v. Washington, ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), does not operate to invalidate Hammoud's sentence under the federal Sentencing Guidelines. Therefore, district courts within the Fourth Circuit are hereby instructed to continue sentencing defendants in accordance with the guidelines, as was the practice before Blakely. In the interest of judicial economy, however, and pending a definitive ruling by the Supreme Court, we recommend that district courts within the Fourth Circuit also announce, at the time of sentencing, a sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3553(a) (West 2000 & Supp.2004), treating the guidelines as advisory only.
Majority and dissenting opinions will follow in due course.
Entered at the direction of Chief Judge Wilkins, with the concurrence of the court.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
U.S. v. Blick
...at 2550 (O'Connor, J., dissenting); id. at 2561 (Breyer, J., dissenting).2 Shortly after Blakely was decided, we convened en banc in United States v. Hammoud, to consider Blakely's impact. Following that hearing, we entered an order affirming the judgment and holding that Blakely did not op......
-
Valentine v. U.S.
...violate the Sixth Amendment." 398 F.3d at 861 (citing United States v. Mincey, 380 F.3d 102 (2d Cir.2004), United States v. Hammoud, 378 F.3d 426 (4th Cir.2004) (en banc), and United States v. Pineiro, 377 F.3d 464 (5th Cir.2004)). The court went on to explain: Even those Circuits that have......
-
U.S. v. Koch
...377 F.3d 464, 2004 WL 1543170 (5th Cir.2004), a majority of our en banc colleagues in the Fourth Circuit, see United States v. Hammoud, 378 F.3d 426 (4th Cir.2004), and some of our colleagues in the Seventh and Ninth Circuits, see United States v. Booker, 375 F.3d 508, 515 (7th Cir.2004) (E......
-
Robinson v. U.S.
...of the petitioner's appeal, multiple circuits declined to extend the decision to federal sentencing. See United States v. Hammoud, 378 F.3d 426 (4th Cir.2004) (en banc); United States v. Mincey, 380 F.3d 102 (2d Cir.2004); United States v. Pineiro, 377 F.3d 464 (5th Cir.2004). Meanwhile, on......