U.S. v. Hebert, No. 96-41240
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | Before DeMOSS and DENNIS; PER CURIAM; DeMOSS |
| Citation | 131 F.3d 514 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scyrus Dion HEBERT, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Docket Number | No. 96-41240 |
| Decision Date | 15 December 1997 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
26 practice notes
-
Chair King, Inc. v. Gte Mobilnet of Houston, No. 14-00-00711-CV.
...because the Fifth Circuit already has determined that no federal jurisdiction is available to the Recipients. See Chair King, Inc., 131 F.3d at 514. In any event, finding federal jurisdiction in this regard would be contrary to the holding of every federal court of appeals that has addresse......
-
U.S. v. Lankford, No. 98-10645
...Lankford's argument requires that we interpret 2261(b)(4), we review the district court's action de novo, see United States v. Hebert, 131 F.3d 514, 525 (5th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 1571 (1998), and in this case must determine whether the court committed plain error. See United......
-
U.S. v. Urban, No. 03-1325.
...the victim's potential as a purchaser of such goods.") (citations and internal quotation marks omitted); United States v. Hebert, 131 F.3d 514, 521 (5th Cir.1997) (defining required "effect on interstate commerce [for Hobbs Act purposes] as a depletion of the assets of a business that purch......
-
Chair King, Inc. v. GTE Mobilnet of Houston, Inc., No. 14-00-00711-CV.
...because the Fifth Circuit already has determined that no federal jurisdiction is available to the Recipients. See Chair King, Inc., 131 F.3d at 514. In any event, finding federal jurisdiction in this regard would be contrary to the holding of every federal court of appeals that has addresse......
Request a trial to view additional results
28 cases
-
U.S. v. Lankford, 98-10645
...Lankford's argument requires that we interpret 2261(b)(4), we review the district court's action de novo, see United States v. Hebert, 131 F.3d 514, 525 (5th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 1571 (1998), and in this case must determine whether the court committed plain error. See United......
-
U.S. v. Hickman, 97-40237
...at length as to why local robberies of the present sort do not "substantially affect interstate commerce." United States v. Hebert, 131 F.3d 514 (5th Cir.1997) (DeMoss, J., dissenting in part); United States v. Miles, 122 F.3d 235 (5th Cir.1997) (DeMoss, J., specially concurring). And the r......
-
U.S. v. Rivera-Rivera, 05-2495.
...that any depletion of assets or forced closure would have an effect on interstate commerce. See, e.g., United States v. Hebert, 131 F.3d 514, 523 n. 8 (5th Cir.1997) ("[A] showing that the business regularly buys goods from out of state allows an inference that the robbery will impair a fut......
-
U.S. v. Urban, 03-1325.
...the victim's potential as a purchaser of such goods.") (citations and internal quotation marks omitted); United States v. Hebert, 131 F.3d 514, 521 (5th Cir.1997) (defining required "effect on interstate commerce [for Hobbs Act purposes] as a depletion of the assets of a business that purch......
Request a trial to view additional results