U.S. v. Henry
Decision Date | 16 July 1980 |
Docket Number | No. 79-1740,79-1740 |
Citation | 621 F.2d 763 |
Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Bullock HENRY, a/k/a Imari Abubakari Obedele, Defendant-Appellant. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Fred L. Banks, Jr., Jackson, Miss., for Henry.
James B. Tucker, Asst. U. S. Atty., Jackson, Miss., William G. Otis, Atty., Patty Merkamp Stemler, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for the U. S.
Before COLEMAN, Chief Judge, BROWN, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, CHARLES CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, RUBIN, VANCE, KRAVITCH, FRANK M. JOHNSON, Jr., GARZA, HENDERSON, REAVLEY, POLITZ, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, RANDALL, TATE, SAM D. JOHNSON and THOMAS A. CLARK, Circuit Judges.*
Considering the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Busic v. United States, ---- U.S. ----, 100 S.Ct. 1747, 64 L.Ed.2d 381, (1980), the sentence is vacated and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with that decision.*
* Judge Jerre S. Williams did not participate in this decision.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
U.S. v. Henry, s. 81-4107
...Henry's "sentence" and remanded the case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with Busic. United States v. Henry, 621 F.2d 763 (5th Cir.1980) (en banc). On March 20, 1981, the district court rendered the judgment from which Henry now appeals. The judgment in effect proce......
-
U.S. v. Henry, s. 81-4107
...further proceedings consistent with Busic v. United States, 446 U.S. 398, 100 S.Ct. 1747, 64 L.Ed.2d 381 (1980). United States v. Henry, 621 F.2d 763 (5th Cir. 1980) (en banc). A little over a month later, James' sentence was also vacated and remanded for consideration in light of the Busic......
-
U.S. v. Cataldo
...452 U.S. 918, 101 S.Ct. 3055, 69 L.Ed.2d 422 (1981). Applying Busic, we vacated Henry's "sentence" and remanded. United States v. Henry, 621 F.2d 763 (5th Cir.1980) (en banc). On remand, the district court vacated the section 924 sentence, reinstated the seven-year section 111 sentence, red......
-
Marshall v. Segona
... ... The letter stated in part: ' ... we [have] received a court order directing us to identify by January 19, 1978, each individual due back wages and the number of hours for which such wages are due ... ' Another affidavit ... ...